www.gravitysimulator.com
My website supports a freeware program I wrote called Gravity Simulator.
It is mostly hand-coded HTML with some Javascript for when you pass your mouse over the selections.
You don't need to understand astrophysics to critique it, but I would love your comments.
Also, I notice a lot of people recently are using Google Ads on their web sites. My website does alright with the search engines and gets about 50 - 100 unique hits per day, but I've never tried to cash-in yet. Any suggestions?
And any suggestions to get ranked higher in the search engines?
demonhale posted this at 16:29 — 12th September 2005.
He has: 3,278 posts
Joined: May 2005
Its a bit bland and gloomy, its like made in FP and dropped to the web... The Content is 1st rate though...
GamesPage.NET posted this at 16:35 — 12th September 2005.
They have: 6 posts
Joined: Sep 2005
I like your menu but i think the graphics are a bit fuzzy and not real, maybe try improving them, i like your system though
kazimmerman posted this at 21:07 — 12th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
The graphics aren't the greatest, and the greens and yellows and whites against the black are starting to hurt my eyes. Try working with PhotoShop or something and set up a great template, not just some content put on a page.
Kurtis
teammatt3 posted this at 00:06 — 13th September 2005.
He has: 2,102 posts
Joined: Sep 2003
For your clicking pleasure http://www.www.gravitysimulator.com
The regular text is too small. Make it at least 14px. You should probably make the navigation links text, there is no real need for those links to be graphics. You can produce that yellow hover with css.
Get rid of that visitor counter on the bottom left, those things are really tacky.
Besides those it's not that bad. It could be more professional looking but it is not a huge problem for you right now.
tony873004 posted this at 05:41 — 14th September 2005.
They have: 15 posts
Joined: Apr 2004
Hi. Thanks for your responses so far. Let me ask a few questions about your comments.
Two of you mentioned the graphics. These are graphics generated by the software that the website supports. So I have to stick with this type of graphics or I'd be misrepresenting the product. But I don't have to stick with the colors. The software can generate graphics in any color. Would a different color combination in the graphics be more pleasing to the eye? Or would it be nicer to do low-contrast versions and use them as backgrounds rather than stand-alone margin graphics?
Regarding the visitor counter, why is that tacky? I've heard other people say this about counters before but I'm not sure why. I've always liked counters. It's the quickest way to tell me how many hits I have, and an easy way to tell visitors that they're not the only ones who visit the site (even though everybody knows they don't have to be accurate). Is there a less-tacky way of accomplishing these tasks? Is there an easy way to do an invisible counter? All the scripts I've seen seem to want to hit the counter as a graphic. And is there one that doesn't register hits from my computer? I probably account for 10% of all my hits, especially when I update the site.
Regarding the text being too small, would I need to use CSS to change this? But if I use CSS, does that prevent users from choosing Largest Text in their view menu and changing the size of the text themselves? I've noticed on some websites that you can't adjust the text size yourself with the View menu.
Regarding buttons, graphics vs. text, why are text buttons better? Is it just that graphics take time to load, or is there another reason? Would changing this to text mean that I'd have to upload a font to my visitors' computers? I wanted to stay away from regular old Times New Roman or Ariel, but I'm not sure what fonts people have on their computers. I like having a semi-unique font.
Thank you for your help.
dougadam posted this at 15:27 — 15th September 2005.
He has: 87 posts
Joined: Jun 2005
I would go with a gray background.
ranoo posted this at 15:19 — 17th September 2005.
They have: 17 posts
Joined: Sep 2005
i suggest you to change your layout.
try to buy a template from ebay or try to find a free one on the net.
You should place a DOCTYPE declaration as the very first thing in your HTML document. For example, for a typical XHTML 1.0 document:
Title
You have to make something for SEO.practicaly your page doesn;t exist for search engine.
good luck
www.ranoo.com (Connecting Webmasters with Freelancers)
tony873004 posted this at 09:31 — 18th September 2005.
They have: 15 posts
Joined: Apr 2004
Why and why?
I'm not doubting you, I'm just curious. What are the pros of having a DOCTYPE like you suggest?
What is an SEO? Search engine optomization? What should I make? The site actually does pretty well with search engines. But it would be nice if it did better.
Busy posted this at 11:12 — 18th September 2005.
He has: 6,151 posts
Joined: May 2001
First impressions, it looks very geeky in a knowlegable kind of way.
Has a big horziontal scroll at 800x600 screen resolution (is the top right image) and all the text is italic, italics should be used for highting important words or sentence as a quote only.
Your links also don't look like links but in some ways it fits with the geeky look.
I'm not saying the site is bad, but is not good either.
There is no home link from the pages
At the bottom of the index you have a counter, how many hits since feb 13th this year, which gives the impression it's a new site, yet you have a copyright notice above your links saying is five years old.
For search engines you are doing some things right, your content is within a list and you're using header tags (h2) etc, you do have a error at the bottom of your page, you have the end body tag () then an image and line break tag before the end html tag (), everything should be before the
To be honest I don't think the design of the layout does justice to your work (the content).
Use the page width (at least 2/3rds of it) for the content, set the images as a muted background image.
The page links (url) are way to long, everything is in two folders off the main directory, getting people to remember that is hard, while the use of keywords can be to your advantage you should use mod_rewrite to allow the use of shorter url's. Having the site in a frame is a big no-no.
Your agreement of the terms for download should be after the actual terms, no one ever reads them but at least you can make them glance over on the way down to the agree/refuse links, ok you have them at the bottom too, remove the top ones
RAY,B. posted this at 11:48 — 18th September 2005.
He has: 18 posts
Joined: Feb 2005
Hi Tony, I think your site is not too bad at all, I use a counter on my site and you can have it invisible if you like and it's free, the site to download it from is statcounter.com
Ray.
demonhale posted this at 13:15 — 18th September 2005.
He has: 3,278 posts
Joined: May 2005
The best way to learn everything thats suggested is to take time and search the forums for your concerns, some suggestions like Ray suggested and other comments were answered or are posted before, so its best if you take time and read the forums... (thats what i did the first time)
JeevesBond posted this at 15:16 — 18th September 2005.
He has: 3,956 posts
Joined: Jun 2002
Well I'm going to be absolutely truthful and say that this site - when measured against something like http://www.csszengarden.com - is terrible. That said, it may well be fit for purpose.
I wouldn't advise getting a template, many people can spot these and it will remove the personality from your site. Of which it has plenty, in fact it looks like something from the mid 90's with its black background and terrible logo (that green is so bad!).
Remove those screenshots as well, they're really not helping the look. You need a slicker design, and that doesn't mean you have to misrepresent the product, maybe put these images into a "screenshots" page. Also removing them will get rid of the scrollbar at 800x600 and give you the opportunity to unify the design a bit, get some consistency!
You're an engineer, so by default you're not going to be very adept at design Secondly, whether you want to listen to my rantings is entirely optional. If what you have is working then you don't necessarily need to change it, what's written above is just opinion.
a Padded Cell our articles site!
Tudor.b posted this at 12:35 — 3rd October 2005.
They have: 35 posts
Joined: Jun 2004
Well, I really like the mid 70`s science fiction movie look. But the art work looks like it was done using Microsoft Paint!
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.