Vandoo
vandoo.com is the website to critique
First, I am sorry about not following the rules in the first post. I am new and didn't fully understand, but if you just say follow TWF and don't tell me what I did wrong, then I don't think anybody is learning anything! I understand that 3 months as not past between posts, but since my first post was closed, I am going to try again, but this time following the TWF.
Could anybody interested, please review my website and provide your comments. People did say that it was plan, so I added some images and a little extra color. But, I did want to keep it very simple and to the point.
I hope this post followed the rules. and if not, please tell me why?
Nate
Dragon of Ice posted this at 16:18 — 7th July 2004.
He has: 578 posts
Joined: Jun 2004
I love it. It's clean, simple, and the graphics are great.
I only have to problems. First, I don't understand why you're burning a morgage(?) for advertising.
Second, you may want to explain what you do on the first place. I had thought you were a real estate agent at first. Maybe a header that says "Digital Estate Agents" or "Your Home For Digital Properties"
Anyway, it's looks great. Keep it Up!
DaveyBoy posted this at 16:22 — 7th July 2004.
They have: 453 posts
Joined: Feb 2003
Don't get me wrong, but isn't there a huge header saying Digital Estate Agents already?
Dragon of Ice posted this at 18:06 — 7th July 2004.
He has: 578 posts
Joined: Jun 2004
Try refreshing the page. It says
"Vandoo"
"Websites for Sale"
And that helps, but it's still a bit unclear.
casechopper posted this at 18:17 — 7th July 2004.
They have: 6 posts
Joined: Jul 2004
Nice clean layout. The buttons in the header seem to be the same as what's in the body of the homepage. It's a little redundant. None of the categories have work in the browse property section (though I assume you know this.)
Thanks,
Sam
Nateuk2000 posted this at 18:34 — 7th July 2004.
They have: 10 posts
Joined: Jul 2004
Yes, nobody has advertised their website yet, thats way the are no links in the browse section. I think I agree that in need to make it more clear on what is being offered at the website. I will make the changes, thanks so far everybody!
Nate
Suzanne posted this at 20:59 — 7th July 2004.
She has: 5,507 posts
Joined: Feb 2000
TWF Rules
The Guidelines for the Website Critique Forum
How to Post a Review
Please take the time to review the work of others.
STwebmaster posted this at 18:02 — 11th July 2004.
They have: 20 posts
Joined: Jul 2004
Looks good. Pictures are worth a thousand words and yours are simple, consistant, and suggestive. Good layout.
davidjaymz posted this at 15:28 — 13th July 2004.
He has: 193 posts
Joined: Jul 2001
I like the layout its very simple and clean. The images for your links work excelently. The only one I'm confused about is the "link advertise" one. why is he burning a contract?
DJ
sp_100 posted this at 08:47 — 19th July 2004.
They have: 10 posts
Joined: Jul 2004
Using Win XP Pro, Mozilla 1.7, cable connection.
I like it very much. Mostly for simplicity.
I would probably make the banner same size, and on the same level on all pages (?)
gsmith posted this at 20:32 — 21st July 2004.
They have: 24 posts
Joined: Mar 2004
use gif images instead of jpegs for pure text images like the "All services are..." and b/w icons.
hanz posted this at 11:24 — 29th July 2004.
He has: 12 posts
Joined: Jul 2004
It looks very nice and clean, but i would change text color.
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.