slicknet.aboho.com

They have: 9 posts

Joined: Aug 2004

http://www.slicknet.aboho.com/
Critique:
* colors match?
* fit together (I only have 1 browser so I don't know what it looks like in other browsers)
* Link colors (are they alright?)

There shouldn't be any broken links. If you find one, please tell me.

Please no "rating" (9/10 kind of things)

--Jason

KarenArt's picture

She has: 354 posts

Joined: May 2001

I don't know how to say this without sounding mean.
Your design gives me the impression of someone who just discovered css and can't wait to use that cool dashed border look on all your divisions.

I know this isn't the case, but your design definately gives me that impression. Try mixing the dashed border with something else, so everything's not the same.

As far as colors... that's such a personal preference. I'm not a huge fan of green and blue, but some people are, so use the colors you think will sell your product.

Sorry if I sound harsh here. I'm just sure you could do better though.

gotta finish redesigning my sites so I can show them again.

The purpose of education is... to get more jokes!

Megan's picture

She has: 11,421 posts

Joined: Jun 1999

You might want to download some other browsers (they're free!) and take a look at how your page looks there. Learn about something called the "box model" and why IE doesn't interpret it correctly.

I agree that this site does look very amateurish. And more amateurish than most amateur sites. One big reason is the Comic Sans font. It looks rediculous. Switch to verdana or another nice sans serif and you'll be much better off.

Congratulations on the CSS layout though! That's a big step to take and it even validates!

They have: 9 posts

Joined: Aug 2004

Oh...I've never seen it in Firefox before. It sure is different.

Abhishek Reddy's picture

He has: 3,348 posts

Joined: Jul 2001

They have: 9 posts

Joined: Aug 2004

I'll tell ya, it looks completely different in Firefox. It looks fine in Internet Explorer but looks really out of shape in Firefox. I am making a similar design, now. Try my home page again. On the web, should I go with a serif or sans serif font? Thanks for letting me know about it KarenArt and Megan, I didn't know it looked like that.

Abhishek Reddy's picture

He has: 3,348 posts

Joined: Jul 2001

The typeface should suit the content -- tone, formality, importance, etc. If you're not sure which to choose, default to sans-serif; you can't go wrong with the basics like readability. Smiling

They have: 9 posts

Joined: Aug 2004

Is it good to mix serif and sans serif or stick with one or the other?

Abhishek Reddy's picture

He has: 3,348 posts

Joined: Jul 2001

Mixing is fine if done right. And be consistent with them -- if you generally use serif for tier-one headings, stick with it everywhere, etc.

Again, if you're not sure and don't feel like experimenting, be safe and go with all sans-serif.

See the site linked in my signature. I use serif for most headings and sans for the rest. Smiling

They have: 9 posts

Joined: Aug 2004

Thanks Abhishek Reddy Smiling

He has: 69 posts

Joined: Oct 2003

No offence, but I think it needs a lot of work. All the different kinds of tables are annoying. The bold letters at the beginning of each paragraph doesn't look right. And the rest of it is rather boring. In your "about me" i get "Unable to load left.php"

They have: 5 posts

Joined: Aug 2004

The color of the font and background is match and have a comfortable looking. However, frankly speaking, the overall look is not attractive. I think it would be better to incorporate some graphics in your site.

FreelanceDog.com - an online market place for project manager and freelance professionals

AyntRyte's picture

He has: 145 posts

Joined: Jun 2004

I like the blue on light blue links. To me, they appear to have the effect of being slightly smeared. (or maybe this first cup of joe hasn't kicked in)

Work on your "slicknet news" heading. Its causing a horizontal scroll.

\\// Robert

The grass is always greener on the other side -- but that's because they use more manure.

Megan's picture

She has: 11,421 posts

Joined: Jun 1999

Sans serif is normally best for screen, and would definitely be best for your site. Use verdana or tahoma or something like that. Sometimes sans-serif can work, but never in Times New Roman. Georgia looks nice.

They have: 9 posts

Joined: Aug 2004

Script: different kinds of tables? I have ONE at the left. How is it confusing?
I'll take out the bold letters then. I've been messing around with the files since I learned
it looked really bad outside of IE. So left.php doesn't exist. It is the least of my
priorities and I'll get around to it.

wildbird: I do plan to put some graphics in but I needed to make sure it looked right in
other browsers first 'cause the last time, I didn't realize it was way out of whack.

AyntRyte: ooops...it's not supposed to have a scrollbar. I'll look into that.

Thank you for your feedback Script, wildbird, AyntRyte, and Megan.

AyntRyte's picture

He has: 145 posts

Joined: Jun 2004

Some more comments now that I have a moment...

Your content would be easier to read if you added some padding to the cells.

To clean up your left-side navigation, may I suggest a CSS-based list. You can find some good examples here:
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listamatic/

I agree with the above - lose the dashed borders (except to draw attention to an important area)

You have a good "metalic" groove going with the blues and grays, but throwing in the green defeats it, most noteably the blue on green in the header.

And I still like the blue on light blue links Laughing out loud

\\// Robert

The grass is always greener on the other side -- but that's because they use more manure.

Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.