Review request: mySportsHost
Slow going in the review forum lately. Here's one to pick apart .
This is my third design in as many months, but I think I finally have it . The only thing that really concerns me, besides the spelling mistakes which are bound to be there, is that the background clashes with the logo on on 800x600 and under. What do you think?
www.mysportshost.com - Reliable budget web hosting.
It's not just for sports anymore!
Megan posted this at 18:29 — 5th December 2002.
She has: 11,421 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
Hi, did you read our Posting Agreement? Just checking.
I think this design is okay, but rather pale and uninviting looking. The layout is really small in comparison to my 1152 x 768 screen resolution. Since you've got so much extra space you could try doing something more interesting with the navigation. The plain text here is rather boring. The arrangement of the navbars seem to be rather odd to me as well. What's the rationale for dividing them up like that?
I also think that the logo could use some work - the swoosh technique has been rediculously overdone. Try to think of a more unique symbol. Since you're calling yourself "mySportsHost", you could incorproate some sort of sports-related image. You should also clarify a little bit about what your intentions are. Is this a hosting service intended for sports-related sites? If so, what kind of special services can you offer them? I know that this is set out in the Company page, but could be made more clear from the start.
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
mySportsHost posted this at 21:39 — 5th December 2002.
They have: 6 posts
Joined: Dec 2002
Thanks for the advice. I'm going to try and make the text larger than 9pt; more then a few people have said it doesn't take up enough space on larger monitors.
There wasn't really a reason for splitting it up other than it all wouldn't fit on one line. I've tried to put the more important links on the top. I'm not really sure what else I could do with the navigation though.
The logo is pathetic, I know . I made it myself, and as you no doubt can tell, I don't have much graphic intuition. I'll probably pay for a better designed one in the future.
As for the sports thing, tricky question. It started out as a sports exclusive site. We had planned, and still are, to offer services that could be utilized by sports sites such as fantasy sports software, online gaming utilities, maybe an advertising network, etc. However, after being open for a month I realized that may have been to small a market for a company without a huge advertising market, so we've opened it to all websites at budget prices. Unfortunately, I think the "sports" in the name is probably harming the company, but we'll see how it goes. I've been trying to think up creative ways to sum this paragraph up, and stick it on the index page, but no such luck yet, well, except for that rather stupid slogan below the logo .
www.mysportshost.com - Reliable budget web hosting.
It's not just for sports anymore!
The Webmistress posted this at 08:11 — 6th December 2002.
She has: 5,586 posts
Joined: Feb 2001
Welcome to TWF.
I agree with Megan that this is ok as it is but really lacks some umph to it. Maybe take the layout wider so it fills the width at 800*600 and add some kind of related picture(s) to add some spice to the page. If you are keeping the background (IMO it doesn't do anything for the design) make the logo have a transparant background so you don't get the white block effect.
Why did you choose these colours? Maybe try some stronger colours and as Megan said a sporty image incorporated into the logo? You could try a Dingbat font for something interesting there.
Please will you help out some of the others here and review their sites as per the rules. This will give them a fresh view of their sites and will also help you with ideas. Thanks
Julia - if life was meant to be easy Michael Angelo would have painted the floor....
Megan posted this at 14:35 — 6th December 2002.
She has: 11,421 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
Those nav options should be organized semantically. Meaning that they should categorized in some way. I usually like to separate administrative stuff (home, links, contact, terms of service) with "real content" (Company, Afilliate (Program), Hosting Plans). I'm not sure what to do with the Customer Support link - probably with the "real content" since it's an important part of the site. I also like to make the "real content" look more important by styling it in a more interesting way so it stands out more.
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
jammin posted this at 16:08 — 6th December 2002.
They have: 222 posts
Joined: Sep 2002
way too much white space for me. fill the gaps around the edges with something.
disaster-master posted this at 18:14 — 6th December 2002.
She has: 2,154 posts
Joined: May 2001
You can see the background of the logo image covering a small part of the background image of the page. (800X600) Maybe you could make that logo background transparent to fix that.
I don't know. It is nice and clean but there just doesn't seem to be enough to the first page.
tango71 posted this at 23:28 — 11th December 2002.
They have: 11 posts
Joined: Dec 2002
You could try precentages in your tables instead of absolute numbers like 500 for width. Precentages will help expand your website for visitors with different browsers, this will also help fill in the white spaces if you don't want to add more content.
To jazz up your website you could consider replacing your present navigational links to navigatable icons. You could always search in the net for free fonts that offer a varity of dingbats to work with.
Just me
TuUzis4u posted this at 00:22 — 12th December 2002.
They have: 7 posts
Joined: Nov 2002
I don't have much exp, but the site seems a little dull. I personally prefer a site that fills my screen, regardless of the resolution. I also think a nav bar on the side is much neater than at the top, especially wen it's not centered.
http://coder.eracreations.com
The new generation of programmers
pmj7 posted this at 03:45 — 12th December 2002.
He has: 234 posts
Joined: Nov 2002
"*Prices are locked at the price you purchased them for life." I'm no business wiz, but are you sure this is a good idea?
Peter
ViZ posted this at 17:52 — 13th December 2002.
They have: 4 posts
Joined: Dec 2002
i think you should move your navigation to the left side of the main table.. align the text right so it all sits along the left side of the table... and where you have the 3 columns listing the 3 services at the bottom you have a shape in each column that doesnt seam to flow with anything else you have going on..
i agree with everyone on the size try to make it 760 width that way it will fit perfectly in a 800x600 then for the rest of the backround maybe pick a gray but i wouldnt tile an image thats sort of outdated IMO
JohnScott777 posted this at 06:47 — 16th December 2002.
They have: 14 posts
Joined: Dec 2002
Being a minimalist, I like it. Not a lot of un-necessary info. Loads super fast, too, which is good for a web hosting site. I just don't trust cheap hosting. Makes me feel better to pay $50 every month.
John Scott
Rebies posted this at 07:12 — 16th December 2002.
They have: 14 posts
Joined: Dec 2002
Third design in three months? Not bad at all. It really takes some time to get design down, and still takes talent to get it perfect.
As for my my thoughts.. It is too narrow and does not really have much. Try adding some more graphics, filling the entire page and so forth.
I don't like the standard links and would suggest that you use some other font that screams "I'm a good looking link". The links are fine in sentenses and such, but for your main links you should have images or something a bit more different.
The paragraph formatting looks good and would not suggest changing that at all.
pfeiffdog posted this at 02:49 — 19th December 2002.
They have: 25 posts
Joined: Dec 2002
Not bad. I think you have laid a good foundation to build on. Good Luck!
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.