For ease of use, I would make the background behind the text white, and have the red elsewhere. Maybe a border around the 'content section' of the site wouldn't go amis; it would break up the site and give it form.
First of all I like the pictures you have on the site!
Next, I would like to suggest you use a thumbnail script to organize the pictures better. This could make your site look much more organized. In addition, the background color is a bit bright. White may be a better choice.
Welcome to TWF! When you posted this thread you saw our posting agreement. We'd appreciate it if you would follow the guidelines there and review some other sites. If there is some reason why you can't or don't want to do this please let us know. If you need some help in writing your review we have created these tips for writing website reviews.
I will have to agree with others, the RED would have to go. It is a terrible eye strain to someone with glasses (me). If the yellow was not soft it would compound the problem.
Other than that everything seems to function well you have a few spelling punctuation errors, but who doesn't. There are several syntax errors on your page, it does not validate as 4.01 trans. They small I would run it through W3C and fix these. I only checked the first page so I don`t know about the rest.
just been on your site again to see if you had changed any thing and i see nothing has changed, whta file format are the front two pictures saved in because they take a few seconds to come up and i have a 1mb line, so i feel sorry for any one on dial up
.5 & .7 Meg Jpeg. for the two front page pictures. These need to be compressed badly. I can put a photo on a website three times that size @ less than .1 m, and still have good quality. I am on 3m DSL, and it takes around two sec. to load them. Monirors are limited to 72 DPI there is no use to have Jpeg's that size.
I agree that the red needs to be toned down, and it did take a while for the pictures to load also. Also everything stays aligned to the left when the browser window is maximized, I would centre it. The page has a very flat look; to change that I would add a gradient to the background, and maybe add some rollovers to your links. I think a 1 pixel border around your images may look nice, also.
You do have some adorable pooches though!!
diceventures posted this at 21:23 — 6th August 2005.
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.
02bunced posted this at 06:24 — 20th May 2005.
He has: 412 posts
Joined: May 2005
It's very red!!!!
For ease of use, I would make the background behind the text white, and have the red elsewhere. Maybe a border around the 'content section' of the site wouldn't go amis; it would break up the site and give it form.
Finally, you have some lovely dogs!
David
nowbot com posted this at 12:26 — 20th May 2005.
He has: 38 posts
Joined: Apr 2005
Hello,
First of all I like the pictures you have on the site!
Next, I would like to suggest you use a thumbnail script to organize the pictures better. This could make your site look much more organized. In addition, the background color is a bit bright. White may be a better choice.
Regards,
James
NowBot
http://nowbot.com
Megan posted this at 13:26 — 20th May 2005.
She has: 11,421 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
Welcome to TWF! When you posted this thread you saw our posting agreement. We'd appreciate it if you would follow the guidelines there and review some other sites. If there is some reason why you can't or don't want to do this please let us know. If you need some help in writing your review we have created these tips for writing website reviews.
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
dogdropins posted this at 13:27 — 20th May 2005.
He has: 47 posts
Joined: Feb 2005
hi i like the site becuase its about dog, i like the picks and info about them, just a question have you tried my site
dogdropins
you can add your dogs for free and others can comment about them
matt king
tsiawd90 posted this at 17:18 — 20th May 2005.
They have: 5 posts
Joined: May 2005
I didn't read the whole posting agreement. I will make sure to review others sites soon.
I will defiantly put my website and dogs info on your site Dogdroppins. You site looks very good.
I'm goingto look into the thumbnail script. Any tips on where I can find that?
dogdropins posted this at 17:39 — 20th May 2005.
He has: 47 posts
Joined: Feb 2005
have you tried http://javascript.internet.com/ they have a lot of scriped on there site.
i will look forward to seeing your dogs on my site very soon.
from matt king
wwwben posted this at 05:18 — 21st May 2005.
He has: 270 posts
Joined: Jan 2005
Well other than some long load time looks good to me
heebiejeebieclu posted this at 14:58 — 21st May 2005.
They have: 527 posts
Joined: Aug 2004
Well, if there's on piece of advice I can give, it's drop the red.
Other than that, I suppose the site suffices.
steve40 posted this at 11:08 — 24th May 2005.
He has: 490 posts
Joined: May 2005
I will have to agree with others, the RED would have to go. It is a terrible eye strain to someone with glasses (me). If the yellow was not soft it would compound the problem.
Other than that everything seems to function well you have a few spelling punctuation errors, but who doesn't. There are several syntax errors on your page, it does not validate as 4.01 trans. They small I would run it through W3C and fix these. I only checked the first page so I don`t know about the rest.
dogdropins posted this at 14:44 — 24th May 2005.
He has: 47 posts
Joined: Feb 2005
hi,
just been on your site again to see if you had changed any thing and i see nothing has changed, whta file format are the front two pictures saved in because they take a few seconds to come up and i have a 1mb line, so i feel sorry for any one on dial up
matt
steve40 posted this at 15:55 — 24th May 2005.
He has: 490 posts
Joined: May 2005
.5 & .7 Meg Jpeg. for the two front page pictures. These need to be compressed badly. I can put a photo on a website three times that size @ less than .1 m, and still have good quality. I am on 3m DSL, and it takes around two sec. to load them. Monirors are limited to 72 DPI there is no use to have Jpeg's that size.
dogdropins posted this at 16:01 — 24th May 2005.
He has: 47 posts
Joined: Feb 2005
yes i agree if it takes to long to load you will lose users
and thats not good
totalnewbie posted this at 18:25 — 6th August 2005.
She has: 24 posts
Joined: Aug 2005
I agree that the red needs to be toned down, and it did take a while for the pictures to load also. Also everything stays aligned to the left when the browser window is maximized, I would centre it. The page has a very flat look; to change that I would add a gradient to the background, and maybe add some rollovers to your links. I think a 1 pixel border around your images may look nice, also.
You do have some adorable pooches though!!
diceventures posted this at 21:23 — 6th August 2005.
They have: 40 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
like others have said, the red is just too much...the black text is very hard to read on it.
other than that, the page looks ok to me.
I might also suggestion you submit your site to this Pet directory
it's fee and a nice relivant backlink
hosting forum - reseller forum - Nintendo Revolution News
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.