I think this is final!!
Rip it apart
http://www.doubleok.com/template.html
tell me what you think! BTW the links do not work!
------------------
Join The Rest Of The Webmasters On The Net!!
Are You Chicken?
http://www.DoubleOK.com
http://www.Webmaster-Club.com
Matt Kaufman posted this at 04:08 — 17th June 2000.
They have: 324 posts
Joined: Dec 1999
I still like the original design on http://www.doubleok.com/ the best
jackchen posted this at 06:07 — 17th June 2000.
They have: 472 posts
Joined: Oct 1999
I don't know about the white space, but the rest looks good enough.
"tayaku, DoubleOK!" (If you understand what this means...)
------------------
Goodbookmarks.com - Quality Links To Quality Sites
jimbo posted this at 06:36 — 17th June 2000.
They have: 11 posts
Joined: Jun 2000
On my machine (IE5, 1024/768), the orange menu bar at the top hung way over the side of the content tables.
Anonymous posted this at 07:26 — 17th June 2000.
They have: 5,633 posts
Joined: Jan 1970
Can anyone help me out, i have no idea why the menu hangs out, it is set to be 590 width and the table is 600 width. im boggled
------------------
Join The Rest Of The Webmasters On The Net!!
Are You Chicken?
http://www.DoubleOK.com
http://www.Webmaster-Club.com
jimbo posted this at 08:09 — 17th June 2000.
They have: 11 posts
Joined: Jun 2000
I don't know too much about DHTML, but it looks as if you have 8 menu items, each with a width of 150. That doesn't answer the question though, because that equals 1,200, and it isn't twice as big as the 600px wide table. You got me stumped .
Sorry
Cloughie posted this at 08:40 — 17th June 2000.
They have: 133 posts
Joined: Feb 2000
I like to Webmasters only bit !!!
How did you do that ? Looks cool...
Anonymous posted this at 10:11 — 17th June 2000.
They have: 5,633 posts
Joined: Jan 1970
what do you mean by this?
------------------
Join The Rest Of The Webmasters On The Net!!
Are You Chicken?
http://www.DoubleOK.com
http://www.Webmaster-Club.com
jackchen posted this at 11:48 — 17th June 2000.
They have: 472 posts
Joined: Oct 1999
LOL
------------------
Goodbookmarks.com - Quality Links To Quality Sites
KeithMcL posted this at 15:05 — 17th June 2000.
He has: 176 posts
Joined: Oct 1999
I think the logo on the main page is nicer than the new logo.
------------------
KeithMcL
Soon to come,
webmasterswork.com
Anonymous posted this at 17:36 — 17th June 2000.
They have: 5,633 posts
Joined: Jan 1970
Matt- Although i do value your personal opinion, it would find it more constructive if you could help me by giving your opinion on the question asked. If you think the design on the main page is better, tell me why and im sure i could take your feelings into account.
Thanks so far, and more critique?
------------------
Join The Rest Of The Webmasters On The Net!!
Are You Chicken?
http://www.DoubleOK.com
http://www.Webmaster-Club.com
Star posted this at 18:58 — 17th June 2000.
They have: 14 posts
Joined: May 2000
Jimbo -- the width (150 pixels) appears to represent the drop down part of the menu.
OKOK.com --
On 800 x 600, I think it was determined in previous posts that was the majority of users' screen resolution, it looks fine in both Netscape and IE. I did notice the mouseover effect along the top of the page (links for ineffable and doubleok) does not work in Netscape.
Anonymous posted this at 02:10 — 18th June 2000.
They have: 5,633 posts
Joined: Jan 1970
i set the width of the menu to 590, and the width of each of the options to 0 which means they are just wide enought to fit their entries. I have reduced the amount of entries, in case that problem was caused by different setting of text size in your bowser. Jimbo can you look again?
------------------
Join The Rest Of The Webmasters On The Net!!
Are You Chicken?
http://www.DoubleOK.com
http://www.Webmaster-Club.com
Cloughie posted this at 09:55 — 18th June 2000.
They have: 133 posts
Joined: Feb 2000
I was just saying your logo looks cool. I like toe Webmasters only text. I was just asking how you did it. What font is it ?
http://www.wannabebig.com
The Ultimate Bodybuilding Resource
Cloughie posted this at 09:56 — 18th June 2000.
They have: 133 posts
Joined: Feb 2000
Thats meant to say THE "webmasters only" bit
AndyB posted this at 10:12 — 18th June 2000.
They have: 344 posts
Joined: Aug 1999
The two ttf fonts used on the logo were Ventilate AOE for the top part, and Felt Marker for the bottom part.
jackchen posted this at 14:36 — 18th June 2000.
They have: 472 posts
Joined: Oct 1999
LOL!
I like toe...
------------------
Goodbookmarks.com - Quality Links To Quality Sites
Justin S posted this at 19:12 — 18th June 2000.
They have: 2,076 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
Hmm, well so far this topic thread has had like 1-2 critiques, and there are 16 posts...
1) Logo looks good, but there is some white space next to the "Webmasters Only" text that needs to be filled in. Either with what you offer or something...
2) There is too much white space above and below the text for each part. I've been seeing this with all your designs. The less white space the better, but it's good to have some. Keep that in mind.
3) Put something in between each menu title to seperate them. Either use '|' or '<>' or something.
4) I don't like the light black color on the top bar. Make it 100% black, or a different color. Also align the text over top of the table, and maybe change the 'DoubleOK.com' to a very small version of your logo.
I think it's the best yet...
------------------
Critiquing over 1000 sites on the Internet today...
Justin Stayton - [email] [icq]
Megan posted this at 14:58 — 19th June 2000.
She has: 11,421 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
Disagree!! White space can be a very useful design element. I agree with Double OK's statement on the first page - white space makes things look less cluttered. I think there might be a little too much around the text in this case - it will be easier to tell when you've got all your text on there. It might be better to reduce it a little more to make the page shorter (less scrolling).
I don't really like the logo. Those white lines are too thick and too close together. It makes the text hard to read. The "webmasters only" might work better if it was in a scripted font overlapping the "Double OK.com" part. Oh, and "webmasters only" should be the same shade of orange as the borders and headers.
I agree with Justin about the grey bar across the top - you might want to get rid of this altogether. The dHTML menu is doing weird things for me sometimes (IE5) - you might want to try a different script.
I like the orange and blue colour scheme. I also like the simple yet effective layout. It will be interesting to see how it looks once you've got all the content in and the sub-pages done.
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
benc posted this at 18:07 — 19th June 2000.
They have: 33 posts
Joined: Jul 1999
My 2 cents:
I think the navigation is great - I had a ton of problems with Netscape compatibility, and had to abandon my DHTML scripts, but yours certainly seems to be working fine (sorta ). And yes, I'm also getting that strange sort of bug where the navbar starts -way- off to the left side (IE5, btw).
As far as the white space goes, I wouldn't go as far to say that the less you have the better, but you have too much right now as it is, regardless of cluttering issues.
Other than that, I like your current logo much better than the one on the template page...
Overall, nice lookin color scheme. It's a shame about that weird navbar bug - I really hope you can get a fix for it...
Approximate 'release' date? I'm looking forward to it
Regards,
-Ben C
Ben C
-"The exception...is to tap the unexceptional."
Goth_Girl posted this at 20:32 — 19th June 2000.
They have: 13 posts
Joined: Jun 2000
The nav works fine for me on NN 4.7, but it obviously won't work for everyone. But I do like the nav.
The white space - hard to tell without actual content. I think that it'll be okay around the text, but not around the banner. But still, you might want to cut down a bit.
At first, I just dismissed the logo as a ad until I got a better look. It's about the same size and shape.
Other than that, clean and simple. I like it.
------------------
Goth Girl
"If you close your eyes in the darkness, you can see many things."
Goth Girl
"If you close your eyes in the darkness, you can see many things."
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.