Heritage Home Inspections
I have just posted my site on the web.
I have checked this site in IE 6.0, Opera 7.54, Netscape 4.79, 7.2, 8.0, Firefox 1.0.7 and Mosaic. All but Mosaic appear to display the site well, with the Mozilla browsers (except Netscape 4.79) displaying it the best. I do not like how IE and Opera handle images displayed on the pages. It's like these browsers stretch the images as opposed to how Netscape and Firefox handle them. I wish I could find a way to fix this.
I tried it in Mosaic to see how it would display in a browser that does not handle frames. Yes frames. Why did I choose frames? Because I wanted a clean and simple site that would always have a navagation menu available. To me, it just feels easier to navagate. This site will be targeted to home buyers, home sellers and realtors, who are looking to purchase a residential home inspection. I want them to be able to quickly find the information they are looking for and then call me to do business.
As far as search engine submittal, I tried to set up the noframes tags to show a home page with links to all of my pages. Check this out if you can. I am hoping that all of the page links will be seen by the search engines.
I also off loaded some javascript to get it out of the way of the meta tags. This javascript will frame any individual page that might someday be individually selected from an online search. The goal here would be to get the reader back to the entire framed site.
Thanks in advance for any help.
Megan posted this at 23:48 — 21st February 2006.
She has: 11,421 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
Hi tstach,
There are lots of ways to keep navigation on every page without using frames. Do a search here on the forums for "PHP inlclude" or "server side include". You could accomplish exactly the same thing without the awkwardness of frames. You'll notice that hardly any big sites on the web use frames anynmore - do they feel difficult to navigate to you??? Just wondering
The site generally looks okay. The navbar is quite nice and the colour scheme is good. There is no logo, which is a problem. Doing up the site text in an interesting font with some sort of graphic or icon would be a big improvement.
The site does a good job of explaining what the home inspector has to offer. I think it would be nice to have a photo of him on the job on the front page - it would tie everything together really nicely and show the human element. I like the way the text is written in the first person rather than a cold third person or plural style.
I also think that the whole site could "sell" a little better. A set of bullet points on the front page (rather than wordy paragraphs that people won't read) would get the key points across more quickly. It's good to have the "contact me" link at the bottom of every page, but I think it could be more integrated. The horizontal rule signals the eye to stop reading, which means people may miss that link. Keeping it in with the rest of the text would draw the user to click on it. That contact page should also include a forum instead of just an email link. That will get people going right away. A form could also prompt them for a few key pieces of information.
Good job overall. The setup is nice and the site communicates well.
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
tstach posted this at 00:46 — 22nd February 2006.
He has: 17 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
Hi Megan and thanks for taking the time to review my first try at HTML.
As I think back on why I went with frames, I guess that one of the issues I thought I would have had otherwise was having menu bars and banners on all the pages (in just HTML) would have meant that I would have had to make multiple changes whenever I had to modify the menus/banners, etc. Only knowing HTML at the time drove this decision. I'll have to look at this PHP and find out how I can use it.
I do have a logo, however I cannot get it to look right in the banner. I drew up an original logo for my business in AutoCAD. From AutoCAD, it can be saved as a bmp or a wmf file. The problem is that when I scale it down to the size I need to fit in the banner frame, I lose so much of the graphical content that you can't even read the company name in the logo. I've opened this up in Photoshop and saved as jpg and gif. No luck. I don't know if it was because this was originally done in AutoCAD or what, but I would still love to include it. Any ideas on this?
Thanks for bringing up the wordiness on the front page. That is an excellent point. The second page in the site (the one I am trying to get the reader to go to) has a bulleted list. I'm thinking that I should move this up to the front page.
Also, I like the idea of putting a form in to contact me. I did this site in my old Frontpage 2000. I think there is a means to create forms in there. I guess that it could be set up so that when the submit button is hit, the form is emailed? Or does the form end up going somewhere in a folder in my hosted account? I'll have to look at this.
Thanks again!
DRP posted this at 09:46 — 22nd February 2006.
They have: 12 posts
Joined: Feb 2006
i think it looks ok, but a bit dull, a logo would look good i bet, and a better layout
Busy posted this at 09:53 — 22nd February 2006.
He has: 6,151 posts
Joined: May 2001
The downside to bad frames is webmasters choose to fix the frames, your site for me at 800x600 can not be fully viewed, the left navigation ends half way through the 'contact me now' link and looking at your source there is an important image that could clinge the deal. Another downside is I can't bookmark any of your pages or send them to friends or family. Would be easier to go to your competitors. Sad but true.
I think you should rename a lot of your pages, (although would be wasted on a framed site), servo1.htm isn't helpful, where as home_inspection.htm as keywords for search egines etc. Some pages are named well.
Another bad things about frames and modern browsers is frames aren't compatible with tab browsing. now if i right click and choose to open in new tab, several pages at once (which I often do), I am left viewing the content page only, no links, no menu, no nothing. You do have a javascript redirect if out of frames but what if javascript is disabled? (like I currently have as previous site had snow flakes and junk).
Ok I'm slightly off you do have some links on pages but not a full navigation (you've done a pretty good job to combat a lot of these issues thou, good on ya)
As for the colours they aren't very inviting, the layout is clean and tidy but the colours need to be maybe more earthy, more relaxing.
tstach posted this at 15:14 — 22nd February 2006.
He has: 17 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
Thanks for the feedback DRP. I agree, it's a bit dull, but I was trying to not get too flashy. I do have a logo (see my post above), however I am not too good with graphics (hence it being done in AutoCAD) and I have a scaling problem with it that I can't seem to resolve.
I see what you mean. I just tried this in 800x600. It looks awful. I have been focusing on trying to make this site look consistent across many different browsers and I didn't even consider resolution.
This, for me will be a problem.
One more reason that is influencing me to look at going to a non framed design.
I think that I am going to look at redoing the site in a non framed layout. I would like each page to show my company name/logo (if I can ever get it to display well) at the top and I would like to always have the navigation menu at the left, with maybe links to all pages at the very bottom of each page. I did the current menu in css. Although I am not well versed in css, are there any formats/templates that could be recommended to use where I could take the information and images on the current pages and migrate to another layout?
Thanks again.
Busy posted this at 20:32 — 22nd February 2006.
He has: 6,151 posts
Joined: May 2001
You did a pretty good job with the CSS and layout (apart from the frames )
I don't think you need a template, I believe you have it in yourself to do it. I have faith in you.
Although a navigation very handy at all times (fixed in postition) seems like a good idea it can have bad effects. Say you name your links to well - make 50k, fly to moon, win lotto ... and your pages are content heavy, no one will read the whole page as the nxt exciting link will always be in eye site saying 'click me, you know you want to'. So is best to let the user read all the way to the bottom and either go back up or use a link at the bottom (bottom perfered on longer pages)
Depending on your link structure, navigation can be across the top and across the bottom or down a side and across the bottom (if page is longer than 600 - wont fit on 800x600 without scrolling down.) Although this is by no means written in stone.
The golden rule = KISS (keep it simple stupid)
Use these forums, we have lots of sections, on all sorts of topics so if you get stuck just ask away, we are here to help.
tstach posted this at 05:03 — 24th February 2006.
He has: 17 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
OK, I've made some major changes. Basically, I scrapped the entire design and went with a css for the new non-framed site.
It has just been put on the host.
hhiky.com
For those of you who reviewed and made comment on the original site. Thank you. I took most all comments into consideration for this new design. I think it will work so much better.
I don't have the individual page files renamed yet and I plan to scan in a hard copy of my logo tomorrow to see if I can get a better resolution this way.
Please let me know what you think about the changes.
Thanks!
Busy posted this at 08:19 — 24th February 2006.
He has: 6,151 posts
Joined: May 2001
Thats heaps better, knew you could do it
One thing though is the navigation. really you need the word inspection after the keywords or you'd end up with things like "radon gas" which read quickly could look like "ramdon gas".
At 800x600 the current navigation is over 3 lines, so am thinking a vertical navigation might be better, could try it without the word inspection and try get it down to 2 lines but may need some seperation somehow.
Looking very professional now to btw
Magnolia posted this at 19:15 — 26th February 2006.
They have: 60 posts
Joined: Feb 2006
Loved the site - didnt find it difficult to work out what you do nor to navigate round it. I didnt think it was dull. In fact I found it sort of comforting which is possibly the feeling of reassurance you want to give to your customers with problems (I never knew all that about termites).
mag's
Newbie webmaster
Remember - Google is your friend!
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.