Group Benefits, Inc.
I have recently added links along the left side of the index page to help people navigate the site. I made this site mainly to help my clients find information such as their provider directory and for employers to have easy access to forms. The links on my site are NOT affiliate links.
Takshaka posted this at 15:45 — 25th October 2005.
They have: 4 posts
Joined: Sep 2004
Viewed in Firefox your header isn't displaying properly, the 2nd line of links is partially obscured by the body, you probably need to tinker with your margins or padding (if you're not sure what I'm talking about I'll take a screenshot).
Also in the header you should change the colour of the link text (or the background) on the left and right as blue on blue doesn't look very professional. Actually you could probably lose most of those links or put them in the footer.
The size of your footer seems unneccessarily large.
The text at the bottom of your logo (under the curved line) is too small to read on my screen.
The layout on inner pages differs from the homepage it would be better if you kept them consistant.
At least 1 of your pages has spaces in the filename (Medical%20Directory%20Page.htm), you should fix that.
This maybe a matter of personal taste but I don't like the flashing 'Bookmark this Site' image.
I hope that's of some help.
RSS Feed Guide
demonhale posted this at 16:10 — 25th October 2005.
He has: 3,278 posts
Joined: May 2005
You have some alignment problems, im using Firefox by the way, that shows the "real" appearance of the site, your links looks more like a set of texts with no meaning, maybe you can make stand out more, and locate them appropriately... You can do much better than this, but its a start...
mikehannon posted this at 18:55 — 25th October 2005.
They have: 64 posts
Joined: Oct 2005
Looking at your html, your meta tags are extremely long. all of your other pages look fine, so i don't know why tags on this page are so long...
Also... looking in firefox i see the same problem with your top navigation. Again i had a look at your code and the problem could be in your "style" tags. for example
"margin-bottom:7;" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="744">"
In style sheets the unit must always be specified such as a percentage or pixel. here you have omited the "px" at the end of 7 to state that it is 7 pixels. Internet Explorer tends to ignores this rule but firefox is very strict with it. I dont know if this will solve the problem but it might.
And also, not so importantly, you might want to consider changing the font. I hear Times New Roman is no longer "fashoinable". More "readable" fonts commonly used are Arial or Verdana.
DeepDrkBrwnEyes posted this at 01:39 — 1st November 2005.
They have: 10 posts
Joined: Nov 2004
When I check my stats I have only had 56 people on the site that use Firefox as their browser in the last year but I have had over 5,000 visit with other browsers.
demonhale posted this at 02:49 — 1st November 2005.
He has: 3,278 posts
Joined: May 2005
and if you dont fix them now, and the browsers start to be compliant, then all these problems will show up, since FF and Opera are the only browsers that is compliant...
vasam posted this at 10:19 — 1st November 2005.
They have: 4 posts
Joined: Nov 2005
- the header doesn't look good in Firefox (top navigation links)
- the footer looks strange in both IE and Fire fox. I think right side should be trancated on the same measure as header's right side.
- I would suggest you work on left navigation menu and make it looks more like menu.
- On some pages header is fluent and has justify align and on other is left align
I think this site needs some design and clearing up work .
robfenn posted this at 13:23 — 1st November 2005.
He has: 471 posts
Joined: Jun 2005
It looks like you've forgotten to upload a style sheet. It couldn't be any more poorly presented to be honest
Megan posted this at 14:58 — 1st November 2005.
She has: 11,421 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
I don't think it's that bad but I agree it could use some work. The fonts are the main problem for me. The serif in the body area is really clashing with the sans serif used for the navigation areas. I would keep those both the same - I've seen serif and sans work when combined like this before but it's really hard to get that to look right. I'd leave it all sans for simplicity's sake. I also think sans would work a lot better for this design.
About Firefox - it's a big up and coming browser. You might see your stats change at any time. The site does work in Opera (although I don't imagine you've had many visitors using it either).
I think the problem with the left side links is that they're almost the same as the top navbar (but not quite). It's a little confusing as to where I should be looking for the things I need. I'm not sure where I should be looking for what I need. What you could do with the left side is divide it up using headers to show what's what. So have one section on forms (and label it as such), and so on from there. I've been reading Steve Krug's [i]Designing Web Usability[/b] which I've found to be really helpful in home page design. It's quite outdated but still has a lot of really useful information - you might want to check it out.
The links in the header area really need to go. Who is going to want to make this page their home page????? Maybe people who work for the company but that's it. So what use is it to the users? None. Who is going to want to email this to their friends? No one. Everyone knows how to add something to favourites so you don't need that either.
Another problem I have with this site is that the design changes from page to page. Things seem to jump around and there is no consistency. I would consider getting a template - either a low cost stock template you can customize yourself or something custom designed. This just looks way too unprofessional. For an insurance company you really need to build trust in your clients and a very amateur website like this is not going to help.
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
uglued posted this at 21:15 — 6th November 2005.
They have: 8 posts
Joined: Nov 2005
Group Benefits, Inc. has got some very useful information. i am finance major and this semester am taking risk management class where we did talk about group benefits.. so the contents seem familiar
i did find the erros realting to viewing it in FireFox and IE , top and bottom banner/navigation parts... if you are not a tech guy like me, u might want to search for free website templates on google and find a ready made template that suits your needs and hopefully it might be all browser compatible...
also i think u are using the font face - Batang which i didnt like personally, might as well leave the default fonts that most browsers will support and users are comfortable with ?
Home | Group Plans | Employer Forms | Directories | Claim Forms | FAQ's | Pre-Paid Legal | Individual Plans | Identity Theft
Short-Term Medical | Travel Insurance | Pet Insurance | Interesting Links | Find a Network Doctor or RX | Buck's Pages
there ' | ' and text are not aligned properly .. u might want something like align="absmiddle" / that will float the text and | in center ..
the contents demand a very crisp and professional look which teh site seems to be lacking ... hope you find this review helpful.
regards,
Sohil.
Uglued
Uglued - The Fastest Growing Desi Community
Roo posted this at 03:14 — 8th November 2005.
She has: 840 posts
Joined: Apr 1999
Oh my...this code is a mess!
The doctype is html 3: That's ancient, outdated and obsolete, yet there is inline styles in use, as well as font tags.
Code errors are causing display issues..mainly the text is displaying as default Times and is unreadable in some places, and difficult to read in others.
There is a table in use on the front page, but no padding or margins are in use, so text is squashed up against the sides.
Tables in use on some pages, but not on others.
I'm assuming it's because this was generated by a WYSIWYG that is pretty much no good: >>>meta name="generator" content="AceHTML 5 Freeware"
Before offering fixes....how much of an understanding do you have when it comes to writing/troubleshooting code by hand in a plain old text editor?
Roo
Blue posted this at 10:24 — 9th November 2005.
They have: 112 posts
Joined: Aug 2001
The thing that jumped out at me is the font. As stated above the serif font is hard to read. I always prefer sans serif fonts but that's just a preference.
The overall format is well balanced with a clear and legible nav bar. I think the logo is a bit small, it's hard to read the phone number and subtext. Maybe enlarge the whole logo by 10%. The photo is a bit small but its a friendly welcoming photo so making it bigger would be a good thing. As stated above the links up in the blue area should be a colour other than blue.
It's an information site and I think the home page is a good format for this purpose. It's well balanced and you can summarise the page at a glance. Just needs to be a bit of fine tuning, and make the other pages the same format as the home page - a.) because its the best format, and b.) because consistency is paramount.
Blue
projectpete posted this at 16:01 — 10th November 2005.
They have: 53 posts
Joined: Nov 2005
For me there are too many plain text links and nothing separating the text links from the actual text. maybe put a line or dotted line between the left nav bar and the main text. also try to differentiate the two different rows of links on the menu bar links with the black background. maybe with borders or different colour backgrounds behind the text
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.