Graphic X Web Design
This is a new web design site that has been around for less than two weeks and has already begun to grow and develop into more than I thought it would. Although I don't have many forum members or posts, the site has been added onto a lot more than I expected it would, as you can see if you browse the 'News' page.
Anyway, onto the critique. I have had asked people what they thought about this site on another forum, and many said it was too bright, and they weren't too fond of the color scheme, but no one said anything bad about the layout. So, if you could (don't have to, but it would be much abliged), please critique my site and rate each of the following individually out of 5, 5 being the highest:
Banner
Layout
Color scheme
Content
This way, I can narrow down what I need to work down. If four or five people rate the color scheme low and the layout high, all I need to do is edit the CSS, whereas, if they are both rated low, I'll basically have to redo everything excluding the actual content.
Here's the link:
Thanks a million! I truly value all of your opinions!
Kurtis
bja888 (not verified) posted this at 03:19 — 4th September 2005.
They have: 5,633 posts
Joined: Jan 1970
kazimmerman posted this at 13:38 — 4th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
I have gotten rid of the marquee and simply centered the link.
It views just fine on 800x600, so I don't know what that statement is for.
Can you explain what you mean by 'too big'? The overall box, or the headers, or what?
I figured the latest news about the site was more important, and no one has had any problems, yet.
There is a news page, but the news box is for the latest news, and where you can subscribe to the newsletter, which also has its own page.
Thank you both.
Kurtis
baldrick posted this at 13:13 — 4th September 2005.
He has: 388 posts
Joined: Apr 2005
Its nice that you want to help the victims of the hurricane but there is a better way to do it than an annoying marquee
Muldoon posted this at 15:31 — 4th September 2005.
He has: 13 posts
Joined: Sep 2005
Hey I like the color scheme, but then I'm no expert .
wwwben posted this at 16:48 — 4th September 2005.
He has: 270 posts
Joined: Jan 2005
Looks good to me
marcus1060 posted this at 19:35 — 4th September 2005.
They have: 14 posts
Joined: May 2004
Banner: 3/5 I don't like the lines under the name. But other then that it's good.
(I noticed this only in Firefox, not IE)
Layout 4/5 I like your layout. But there is lots of empty space in the content area.
Color scheme 5/5 I like it. It's original, not many sites look like that.
Content 3/5 I didn't read your content. But there is defiantly content missing off of the front page. It's just blank.
kazimmerman posted this at 19:40 — 4th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
Thank you for taking the time to break down the sections.
BANNER:
The banner should be fixed, if not...please let me know. It was like that because of certain settings in CSS, but they have been changed.
LAYOUT:
The layout is going to change slightly. The navigation and advertisement boxes will be going on the left, body in the middle, and news and sponsors boxes on the right. This should reduce the amount of blank space without completely ridding the site of anything.
COLOR SCHEME:
Thank you. I'm always trying to be unique.
CONTENT:
Again, the content shouldn't look as bad once the layout is changed.
Thanks again for your response.
------EDIT------
I don't want to double-post, so here's the update. I have completed the change I was talking about above (in this post).
Kurtis
marcus1060 posted this at 21:45 — 4th September 2005.
They have: 14 posts
Joined: May 2004
Yeah the logo works now.
And wow, I like the new layout way better!
bja888 (not verified) posted this at 21:45 — 4th September 2005.
They have: 5,633 posts
Joined: Jan 1970
If it looks fine at 800X 600 why have that?
Too big as in width. I find all menus look best no bigger than 180 px
kazimmerman posted this at 22:39 — 4th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
Thanks Marcus! I like the new layout much better too.
And to bja888:
Re-read the message. It says it looks best at that screen resolution, but it looks fine at any resolution.
Kurtis
totalnewbie posted this at 23:52 — 4th September 2005.
She has: 24 posts
Joined: Aug 2005
I agree with bja888... People aren't going to change their resolution just to view your site, so why even let them know they are not seeing it in it's "best" form?
Banner:The banner is good, but maybe should tie in to your logo a bit more?
Layout:The layout is fine, but there is too much empty space in the Navigation Box.
Color scheme:I like the colors, it is unique, but maybe not too easy on the eyes...
Content: Hmm.. the only thing that sticks out to me here is your use of "we" and "my".. 'Each month we will offer a different special to a certain type of site, each theme of my choosing.'
If its just you, then stick with that, if there is a group of you, then maybe you shouldn't be making all the decisions...
It sounds like you are either trying to make us think there is a bunch of you working there, but really it's just you, or you are a control freak of a boss!!! I'm sure you didn't mean it like that, but that is how it came across to me... Just my opinion...
kazimmerman posted this at 00:00 — 5th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
Okay, since people seem to be ticked off by the screen resolution statement, I'm going to move that to the bottom of the page, under the copyright information. That way it's there, but not in the main area.
About the navigation, could you possibly post a screenshot? There shouldn't be any empty space in the navigation box...
And about that statement about 'we' and 'my', I'll get it fixed.
Kurtis
jcprov21 posted this at 19:18 — 5th September 2005.
He has: 183 posts
Joined: Sep 2005
I dig the site layout, also the coloring. I dislike black as a website background, so this is a nice thing to look at.
I would go with if i had my own opinion, get a Yahoo Domain or something like
http://www.graphicxwebdesign.net/
Then just have it foreward to your current site, most people who surf the net like just basic address layout.
But that is my 2 cents
HAHA,
Working on some sites that are of better quality!
kazimmerman posted this at 19:49 — 5th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
Yeah, well, I don't have any money to spend on a domain name.
jcprov21 posted this at 00:44 — 6th September 2005.
He has: 183 posts
Joined: Sep 2005
I pay $9.95 a year for my domain that forwards to my site, i found i get more traffic when i have a simpler name.
But hey, who says you have to have one? right?
HAHA,
Working on some sites that are of better quality!
robfenn posted this at 22:36 — 5th September 2005.
He has: 471 posts
Joined: Jun 2005
Huh? What world are you in? Domains cost nothing... i can buy a .co.uk domain for £1.99!
Not the best design i've ever seen, but not the worst. Could do with some pictures!
-Rob
jcprov21 posted this at 00:51 — 6th September 2005.
He has: 183 posts
Joined: Sep 2005
Here is my idea for you,
go here:
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/
$9.95 a year can't be bad right?
then, it has an option for a forward, then just have it forward to your current site.\
HAHA,
Working on some sites that are of better quality!
kazimmerman posted this at 02:00 — 6th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
I'll definitely consider it, but at this point it's not top-priority. Thanks.
kazimmerman posted this at 20:46 — 7th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
If you all could check out my forum and review the design as well, I'd appreciate it. I'm not too sure what I think of it and would appreciate a couple outside opinions. Thanks.
http://graphicx.abshost.net/forums/
Kurtis
dougadam posted this at 19:41 — 8th September 2005.
He has: 87 posts
Joined: Jun 2005
I feel you should put your logo in the banner.
kazimmerman posted this at 20:18 — 8th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
It's something I considered, but it didn't look right. It will be implemented in the new design (coming soon).
Thanks.
kazimmerman posted this at 00:49 — 14th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
I have done a redesign. The color scheme is basically the same, but the layout is different. The main reason I did this was so I could make my forum template just like my main site template, which was nearly impossible with the old one. I haven't finished the forum template yet, so I'd rather you not comment on that yet. But let me know if everything shows up right and what you think.
By the way, the lowest screen resolution this site can be viewed in correctly is 800x600. Sorry to any 640x480 users!
Kurtis
timjpriebe posted this at 12:13 — 14th September 2005.
He has: 2,667 posts
Joined: Dec 2004
I have to agree that the header in the forums should be the same as elsewhere on your site. Currently the inconsistent aspect of that is working against you.
I've not looked into the exact cause, but in Firefox, the top menu is not spaced out correctly. After noticing this, I double checked it in IE, and it looks fine. However, more and more people are using Firefox. I just recently ran into my first client who was already using Firefox before I suggested it.
Also, for some reason it just looks odd to me to have the red/maroon border on the left, bottom and right of the various boxes, and not on the top. It also seems as if there should not be a border at all on the top banner, and instead of making the bottom portion of that banner the darker beige color, it should just be transparent so you can see the page's background through it. Does that make sense?
Tim
http://www.tandswebdesign.com
kazimmerman posted this at 20:31 — 14th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
Could you post a screenshot of what it looks like in FireFox. I don't have that browser and can't see for myself.
I'm not sure what you mean about the borders around the boxes, explain?
I'm working on the transparent thing, but the reason that I'm having trouble has to do with the way the actual header is set up, which I really don't want to explain.
Thanks for the reply!
Kurtis
kazimmerman posted this at 00:49 — 15th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
By the way, I have now finished working the forums into the overall design. It's not perfect (the boxes on the left are missing), but with them it doesn't quite work out. I was able to completely incorporate the header and CSS properties though.
Kurtis
timjpriebe posted this at 12:05 — 15th September 2005.
He has: 2,667 posts
Joined: Dec 2004
I can't send a screenshot from where I'm at right now, but you might try this site:
http://browsercam.com/
I did the 24 hour trial awhile back, and plan to sign up for an account.
Tim
http://www.tandswebdesign.com
kazimmerman posted this at 20:36 — 15th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
Okay, thank you. I am trying it out right now and I'll see if I can see what you're talking about.
kazimmerman posted this at 20:38 — 15th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
Wow, there are a lot of problems with FireFox. I checked every version of Fire Fox at every resolution possible, and I don't think any of them were completely correct. I'm going to need to figure this one out, or reconsider my design.
Kurtis
ranoo posted this at 15:58 — 17th September 2005.
They have: 17 posts
Joined: Sep 2005
hmmm
try to buy some tutorials to see how a website can be done.
the only think i like is the color scheme
but don't be mad on me. i hope you can make bettere than this.if you want to sell web design services you hav first to have a very nice website
Good luck friend
www.ranoo.com (Connecting Webmasters with Freelancers)
kazimmerman posted this at 01:45 — 18th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
*sigh*
I have redesigned my site once again and I am going to go to Browser Cam and check other browsers, but what do you all think of the new design?
Personally, I like the banner better. That's my favorite part. Let me know!
http://graphicx.abshost.net
Kurtis
timjpriebe posted this at 14:11 — 19th September 2005.
He has: 2,667 posts
Joined: Dec 2004
The banner is pretty simple, which I do like. However, it has too many "jaggies" right now. Something as simple as resizing it to 50% or so may take care of that.
In fact, my other issue aside from the jaggies is the size. The banner is simple enough that it should take up a lot less room than it does. So resizing to 50% or so should solve that as well.
Tim
http://www.tandswebdesign.com
DaveyBoy posted this at 23:01 — 19th September 2005.
They have: 453 posts
Joined: Feb 2003
Not meaning to sound cruel or anything at all, but when you offer web designing services, you really do need to be able to sell the services to the clients - even if it's a free service like your own. A designer's home page is their chance to show visitors just what they can do, if you have a sloppy home page they aren't going to stick around. I saw the previous design and although it was pretty rough around the edges it did have the makings of something usable. What i see now doesn't really. It looks like it took about 2 minutes to create it - apologies if it did take longer. I don't really see a design as such, there's a colour scheme in place which is nice but then a choppy logo which is actually in two parts so it doesn't look like a logo anyway. the menu could be nicely integrated into a design instead of being in limbo there where it is.
Sorry for all the negativity, it's just it's frustrating when people claim to be web designers yet have pages like this.
Davey
kazimmerman posted this at 20:36 — 19th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
I will take care of that. I'll have to reposition a few things, but I understand what you mean, and it's a good idea. Thanks.
gfxsector posted this at 10:17 — 20th September 2005.
They have: 5 posts
Joined: Sep 2005
Banner needs improving and so do the grads. the design seems really plain to me. also you should get rid of the scrollbar at the bottom (i use 1024x768)
kazimmerman posted this at 23:14 — 20th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
Okay, I have tried to improve on most of the things you all mentioned. I did change the color scheme, but I kind of like it a bit more, but I'm not too sure. This is just a temporary folder set up, so the navigation links will actually take you to the main site. I just want to know if the design is any better...
http://graphicx.abshost.net/temp/index.html
Thanks.
Kurtis
demonhale posted this at 00:25 — 21st September 2005.
He has: 3,278 posts
Joined: May 2005
Youre quite on your way here, just correct some graphics, the algnments as well, read the thread were I got my first site critiqued and you get what i mean, it helped me improve a lot!
kazimmerman posted this at 00:29 — 21st September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
What exactly do you mean by 'correct some graphics'? And I will check out that thread. Thank you.
demonhale posted this at 00:36 — 21st September 2005.
He has: 3,278 posts
Joined: May 2005
I mean your header graphics idea is ok as its cartoony and all, the problem is, its supposed to be a header and as commented before its a little jagged, maybe make it a little crisp and sharp! also on the design aspect, that image shouldnt touch the nav bar, the feet of the x cartoon does, the title "Web Development Resources Helping webmasters is the game!" isnt appropriately aligned well, and You could use better fornts here. An idea is for you to use a graphic here rather than a text, you could always use an alt tag if your concerned with the SEO... On the contents, the font is quite big really and you should have top and bottom padding to make it look less constrcicted... The Nav bar doesnt look obvious, At first glance I thought they were random texts... They are too close to each other as well as the font you chose was also large... Maybe you can divide and space them as well... The design and scheme you opt here is already a good start, just keep on working on it then repost your update...
kazimmerman posted this at 00:46 — 21st September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
Okay, I'm going to work on creating one banner that will include the name (duh) and slogan, and I'm going to keep the X for fun. I will try to make the navigation more obvious...I'm trying to think of something that would help...any suggestions?
Thanks again.
Kurtis
demonhale posted this at 00:53 — 21st September 2005.
He has: 3,278 posts
Joined: May 2005
make it either with borders, or make it graphic then overlay the linked texts.. gtg now
kazimmerman posted this at 12:19 — 21st September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
Okay, thank you. I have updated it, and I'm getting ready to work on something that will make the navigation more obvious.
http://graphicx.abshost.net/temp/index.html
Kurtis
demonhale posted this at 13:11 — 21st September 2005.
He has: 3,278 posts
Joined: May 2005
Ok repost it when you want it critiqued again.
The new page youve just done has these minor problems, the texts below graphic X is too light, darken it, also the top margin on the content pushes the container div to push down including your copyright text...
demonhale posted this at 03:48 — 23rd September 2005.
He has: 3,278 posts
Joined: May 2005
it would be inside the div are texts are not big for the div container or you have problems with nested divs... check out the code... If I have the time you could probably e-mail me the html and css also the graphics youre working on and I could fix that for you... but well... :freak:
timjpriebe posted this at 13:43 — 21st September 2005.
He has: 2,667 posts
Joined: Dec 2004
I like it! Very simple and clean now.
The only issue I had was that the menu items are spaced properly when viewed in IE, but not when viewed in Firefox. Since your site is for webmasters, you'll likely want to fix that.
Tim
http://www.tandswebdesign.com
baldrick posted this at 18:34 — 21st September 2005.
He has: 388 posts
Joined: Apr 2005
Much better. I like it but its a bit hard to see your slogan make it a little darker.
kazimmerman posted this at 20:11 — 21st September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
I'm not sure why it isn't spacing properly in FireFox, anyone have any ideas? I'll research it later if not...
I'm confused about the slogan. It looked so much better on my other computer. I'll take care of that.
Kurtis
kazimmerman posted this at 21:20 — 21st September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
I have updated the banner, yet I am still working on the navigation. I'll update when I get that fixed.
http://graphicx.abshost.net/temp/index.html
Kurtis
kazimmerman posted this at 01:23 — 22nd September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
I would really like to make this the actual site template, but I need to know, from as many people that have time, does it show up correctly in your browser? I just really need to know if it appears correctly, and if I get some good feedback, I'll move some folders around and it will be the new design.
Kurtis
DaveyBoy posted this at 05:33 — 22nd September 2005.
They have: 453 posts
Joined: Feb 2003
It all seems to look the same in Firefox and Internet Explorer, all except the bottom of the site, as shown here :
Internet Explorer 6 :-
Firefox 1.0.6 :-
kazimmerman posted this at 11:24 — 22nd September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
What resolution are these at?
DaveyBoy posted this at 11:43 — 22nd September 2005.
They have: 453 posts
Joined: Feb 2003
1280x1024 but the copyright is missing the gray strip on all resolutions in firefox.
demonhale posted this at 17:51 — 22nd September 2005.
He has: 3,278 posts
Joined: May 2005
hey thats what I said the misalignment before... read page 3
kazimmerman posted this at 00:21 — 23rd September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
I didn't know exactly what alignment you were talking about demonhale.
I don't really know what to do about this. I figured text that was within the DIV would be displayed in the DIV, silly me I guess. :rollseyes:
Kurtis
kazimmerman posted this at 11:43 — 23rd September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
Okay, I'll work on it. I think the DIV is too small for the text. I tried to make it just big enough to fit the text with a small margin, but I may have made it too small. I'm sorry I misunderstood your post the first time. Thanks again.
Kurtis
kazimmerman posted this at 21:36 — 23rd September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
This has become quite a project.
Can those of you whose browsers were not displaying the site correctly please try again and let me know if anything has changed as far as the alignment goes?
Thanks ahead of time.
Kurtis
demonhale posted this at 01:27 — 24th September 2005.
He has: 3,278 posts
Joined: May 2005
which link? I checked the one above but its still the same alignment problem,
DaveyBoy posted this at 02:29 — 24th September 2005.
They have: 453 posts
Joined: Feb 2003
copyright is still slightly off in firefox.
kazimmerman posted this at 03:06 — 24th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
Okay, thank you both. I'm having trouble figuring this one out. I've changed the padding (well, margin) on the body DIV and I've increased the height of the copyright DIV, but nothing is working...
I'm puzzled, in the least.
Kurtis
demonhale posted this at 03:49 — 24th September 2005.
He has: 3,278 posts
Joined: May 2005
I think the problem is the top div or margin which pushes the contents down (maybe non-fixed font size) problem too...
demonhale posted this at 03:58 — 24th September 2005.
He has: 3,278 posts
Joined: May 2005
Ok I found the problem on the copyright alignment, remove the tags on your copyright texts inside the div on your html, thatll fix that...
kazimmerman posted this at 14:36 — 24th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
tags removed. Does it display correctly now? Thanks again to all of you who have helped me through this.
kazimmerman posted this at 01:01 — 26th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
Okay, I feel kind of bad because I've spent so much time on this template that you all have helped me so much with, and now I've made a new one. I will find a good use for that other template though.
Now, what does everyone think of the new look? The reason I tried something new was because I took some advice (what! That's unheard of!) and browsed some other web design/development sites and got ideas for what I want my site to look like.
I'm very proud of this new design, and I feel I matched the forum up pretty well.
Let me know what you all think!
Kurtis
demonhale posted this at 02:02 — 26th September 2005.
He has: 3,278 posts
Joined: May 2005
asme link? or template link?the red one on http://graphicx.abshost.net/ looks ok, needs just a little refinement, the leftside division overflows the body btw...
DaveyBoy posted this at 02:14 — 26th September 2005.
They have: 453 posts
Joined: Feb 2003
navigation isnt spaced in firefox, the 'web development' bit looks at though it should be tight up against the header, not a little white gap as is there now.
kazimmerman posted this at 11:22 — 26th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
Okay, I can fix the navigation and the header part.
demonhale, I'm sorry, but I have no idea what you're talking about. The 'left-side division'?
Thanks.
Kurtis
demonhale posted this at 12:55 — 26th September 2005.
He has: 3,278 posts
Joined: May 2005
See your page is divided on two parts right? See the left side with the hosting pic overflows on the body, im using FF...
kazimmerman posted this at 20:23 — 26th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
Okay, I understand what you mean now. I'll look into it. Should be fairly easy to fix.
kazimmerman posted this at 00:20 — 27th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
I believe I fixed the navigation and the overflowing of the side bar. Let me know if it is fixed or not.
demonhale posted this at 02:17 — 27th September 2005.
He has: 3,278 posts
Joined: May 2005
still there
DaveyBoy posted this at 02:25 — 27th September 2005.
They have: 453 posts
Joined: Feb 2003
nav is fixed though
baldrick posted this at 17:54 — 27th September 2005.
He has: 388 posts
Joined: Apr 2005
There is an extra pixel of padding to the left of the tab that says web development in FF.
kazimmerman posted this at 22:28 — 27th September 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
Okay, the padding won't be an issue. That's actually just the white in the image I believe.
I'll try again on the overflowing.
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.