What monitor are you using?
I just recently had my 19" Optiquest monitor go out. So I ordered a 19" LG Electronics 995E after reading some good reviews and customer comments. The footprint is a bit bigger than the Optiquest but it has 18" of viewable space. Real nice resolution on this monitor. The price was great too, only $250 including shipping and I got it in two days time.
Anybody out there using less than a 19"?
Mark Irving
I have a mind like a steel trap; it is rusty and illegal in 47 states
Megan posted this at 13:08 — 9th May 2001.
She has: 11,421 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
Ummm. me. I think mine at home is only a 15". My computer sucks, okay. You don't have to rub it in
mairving posted this at 13:29 — 9th May 2001.
They have: 2,256 posts
Joined: Feb 2001
Megan, sorry to hear that. Going to upgrade soon?
Megan posted this at 14:38 — 9th May 2001.
She has: 11,421 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
Yeah... I really should just go for it. Right now I'm trying to decide who to buy from - Dell or a local shop. I'm sort of leaning towards the latter. I just keep waiting thinking, oh yeah, in a comple of months the 1 ghz's will be more affordable, and now that they're getting there, I'm thinking, well, if I wait until fall I could probably get a 1.5 etc. etc. People keep telling me just to upgrade whatever I need (monitor in this case, but I've complained about pretty much everything). There's really no point in upgrading when literally everything needs to be.
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
mairving posted this at 15:49 — 9th May 2001.
They have: 2,256 posts
Joined: Feb 2001
You are right. I have built quite a few computers in my life. It reaches a point where upgrading is more costly than buying new. A lot of people still choose this route because it is cheaper in the short term.
My advice is never to buy top of the line processors. Look at what offers the most bang for the buck right now. Here is an example. AMD processors are priced as follows:
So you can see the biggest bang for the buck is the 900mhz. The 1.2Ghz is also a good deal. The top of the line is overpriced.
Here are the kind of specs that I would look for:
You should be able to get something like that for about $1000/US. It is also good to know that Dell is trying to lowball their computers to grab more market share. So their prices are low.
Mark Irving
I have a mind like a steel trap; it is rusty and illegal in 47 states
Megan posted this at 16:38 — 9th May 2001.
She has: 11,421 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
Are you serious??? I priced out something at dell and wasn't getting nearly that much (ie. only 128 RAM, 20 GB hard drive, 17" monitor) for roughly $2000 Canadian.... what's up with that ?!?
Holy Cow - I'm just looking at the US site and even when you factor in the exchange rate the US prices are still cheaper than the Canadian prices. Man, you guys can get stuff so cheap over there!
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
TheGizmoid posted this at 22:50 — 11th May 2001.
They have: 168 posts
Joined: Apr 2001
>>My advice is never to buy top of the line processors. Look at what offers the most bang for the buck right now.<<
And then you can overclock it! Slap on some heat sinks and peltiers and go to town. My husband is seriously into this stuff. He built a closed loop watercooling system and has a radiator installed in his case. Of course, he also has modded the case to have a clear lexan side so you can see the cool colored flourescent lights he's got inside the case. There's a whole geek subculture that's into overclocking. http://mota.mota.com/ if you want to see pics.
As for monitors, I'm using a 17" NEC MultiSync XV that's over five years old. Of course, so is my computer. I've gone through several processor upgrades, though. I was on the verge of buying a new Mac G4 dual processor tower when I became unemployed. So I'm limping along on the old one for now.
Megan, I know how you feel!
Kufr posted this at 03:38 — 29th September 2007.
He has: 16 posts
Joined: Jul 2007
*bump*
I currently have a dual-monitor setup. The main monitor is a Samsung SyncMaster 941BW (1440x900). The other one is a NEC LCD1530V (1024x768). I rarely use two monitors at once, but I use the 1024x768 to test websites and webpages I've worked on.
greg posted this at 04:36 — 29th September 2007.
He has: 1,581 posts
Joined: Nov 2005
I started reading this thread, and was wondering what the hell megan was doing with a 15" monitor
a webmistress with a 15" monitor?? erm?
then I cringed reading mairving's post
32mb graphics card?? 128 mb card is about £5
talking about buying a 900mhz cpu? erm?
then i saw *bump* and read the thread was 6 years old
class
[ontopic]
I have my pc through a 32inch samsung high def LCD
1360x768 resolution
gets a bit tricky web coding, changing res etc, I have a 15" lcd for double checking.
sitesupport posted this at 04:29 — 29th September 2007.
He has: 190 posts
Joined: Jun 2007
hp pavilion v70s
one that came with the computer (an old 2002 windows xp)
Megan posted this at 14:30 — 30th September 2007.
She has: 11,421 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
LOL, that's hilarious! The computer I was talking about getting then is now our server machine that sits down in the basement and handles our internet connection and stuff (ask Liam, he set it up). It can't even run a GUI anymore
Now I'm back to a 15" screen, but this time in the form of an acer laptop (1.66ghz, 1g ram, 120G hard drive).
I have dual 19" monitors at work ... unfortunately, when I move to my new job in a few weeks I'll only have 2 17". Maybe I can upgrade that ...
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.