disaster-master posted this at 01:17 — 25th May 2002.
How/why is it that with some URL's you don't have to include the www. but with others you do?
For example url.com or just url.com
And what would be the reason that a site can't be accessed without using the www part in the url?
Brian Farkas posted this at 01:42 — 25th May 2002.
They have: 1,015 posts
Joined: Apr 1999
That has to do largely with the configuration of the web host. Most hosts will allow both with and without the www, but some, for some reason, only offer it one way. Hope this helps.
Brian
disaster-master posted this at 02:10 — 25th May 2002.
She has: 2,154 posts
Joined: May 2001
Yeppers that helped. Thanks Brian.
jackson992 posted this at 20:42 — 25th May 2002.
They have: 15 posts
Joined: May 2002
thah is very odd. I have never typed www when typing in a addy into the address bar. And I don't think I've had problems with any coming up.
zollet posted this at 20:46 — 25th May 2002.
He has: 1,016 posts
Joined: May 2002
Unless you do an A RECORD of * for your domain, you HAVE TO add an A RECORD for "www" otherwise it will not work. The reason you (Jackson992) never have had any problems is because when you add a domain to a DNS server, you add it without www and then you can add www or mail or * (* = wildcard).
mjames posted this at 21:36 — 25th May 2002.
They have: 2,064 posts
Joined: Dec 1999
Just type whatever.com into your address bar and hold Ctrl while you hit Enter and it'll fill the "www" and ".com" in for you. So you don't have to worry about the beginning of it as long as it's a .com.
taff posted this at 22:25 — 25th May 2002.
They have: 956 posts
Joined: Jun 2001
Well I'll be darned! Learn something new every day.
Thanks Marc
.....
Abhishek Reddy posted this at 05:18 — 26th May 2002.
He has: 3,348 posts
Joined: Jul 2001
That's IE-only. Opera 6 adds (prepends?) just "http://" and Netscape doesn't do anything.
mairving posted this at 11:16 — 26th May 2002.
They have: 2,256 posts
Joined: Feb 2001
It is odd that even some large companies don't get it.
Try this URL http://adobe.com .
mmi posted this at 16:56 — 26th May 2002.
They have: 457 posts
Joined: Jan 2001
Is the www necessary?
Brian Farkas posted this at 17:38 — 26th May 2002.
They have: 1,015 posts
Joined: Apr 1999
Yes, there may be reasons for this, but they balance any benefits against lost customers who only type domain.com and move on. For a large company like adobe, a couple customers lost may not mean much -- or they will know to go back and type in the www. But for a smaller site, where the customer does not what they want specifically already in mind, this is not recommended... because a customer could type in domain.com, get an error and assume that the site doesn't work, then moving on to the competitor.
mairving posted this at 18:56 — 26th May 2002.
They have: 2,256 posts
Joined: Feb 2001
I think as Brian mentioned that most visitors will figure out that they need a www in their address but why. Why cause your visitors even the slightest inconvenience like this when it is so easy to setup.
Mark Irving
I have a mind like a steel trap; it is rusty and illegal in 47 states
cds posted this at 06:13 — 1st June 2002.
They have: 359 posts
Joined: Mar 1999
Having a * or www A RECORD isn't always the complete solution. It also can depend on whether the company is using NameVirtualHost vs just straight IP VirtualHost. With IP based, a * A RECORD should resolve everything prepended to a domain name.
However, if using NameVirtualHost and if more than one domain is running on an IP address, a ServerAlias needs to be added to your sever config or it will not resolve. If your ServerName is domain.com, then you also need a ServerAlias domain.com
NameVirtualHost 0.0.0.0
<VirtualHost 0.0.0.0>
ServerAdmin someone@somewhere
DocumentRoot /path/to/doc/root
ServerName <a href="http://www.domain.com" class="bb-url">domain.com</a>
ServerAlias domain.com
etc
etc
</VirtualHost>
Like was said, they either don't care or maybe they don't know. Have run into a few sysadmins out there that I know more than they do and that is not saying much for them. I discovered the ServerAlias thing after a couple hours or beating my head against my desktop.
Dan
Recycle Video Games Network
Stupidity killed the cat, curiosity was framed!
Josh2 posted this at 16:51 — 18th August 2002.
They have: 37 posts
Joined: Aug 2002
I find this annoying as on my http://accursed.co.uk you can only choose one or the other.
That's 34sp.com for you. I'm going to get another host soon anyway
[Josh]
zollet posted this at 01:41 — 21st August 2002.
He has: 1,016 posts
Joined: May 2002
That's not good at all. I know many people (mainly newbies) that think domains must have "www." infront of them in order to worka nd the more advanced users will probably not write the "www." since they know most sites don't need it.
Kristen posted this at 08:36 — 3rd September 2002.
They have: 14 posts
Joined: Sep 2000
When I first got my domain the www didn't work, actually it DID work, but forwarded you to someone else's site entirely. My host blamed the registrar, and the registrar blamed the host. So eventually I just gave up and always made sure I put in the http:// when I provide my domain name, so people wouldn't mistakenly throw in the www themselves as well and get taken to this very ugly site that had nothing to do with me.
These days, with a different host, it all works perfectly, but it was very weird for a while there.
Just throwing in my 2 cents
-Kristen
13th Hour Design - Log of Links - StillPixels
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.