Poll: Which spec do you code to?
by Megan, Tue, 2002-08-13 16:22
html 4.0 transitional
50% (7 votes)
xhtml 1.0 transitional
36% (5 votes)
xhtml 1.0 strict
7% (1 vote)
other
7% (1 vote)
none
0% (0 votes)
Total votes: 14
jkd posted this at 21:26 — 18th August 2002.
They have: 21 posts
Joined: Oct 2000
Because ultimately, it makes things easier for all developers (esp. me ) if more people used Moz. I can do more with less code while abiding by web standards in Mozilla than I could ever do in IE. So by promoting it, I hopefully encourage other developers to uses and and promote it on there own, until it becomes a dominant browser.
CodingForums, JavascriptCity/Pageresource, SitePointforums, Devshed, I can't overlook these ones too.
Everyone must witness the greatness of the lizard!
Supermod @ CodingForums.com
Josh2 posted this at 16:35 — 18th August 2002.
They have: 37 posts
Joined: Aug 2002
Ok...
Well, I would say I know a fair bit about HTML, but I'm new to the others. I've heard of them but what are the differences?
caislander posted this at 00:57 — 18th August 2002.
They have: 30 posts
Joined: Oct 2000
jkd,
What do you do go forum to forum preaching the glory that is MOZ? j/k jkd, anyway Moz is an excellent browser probably the best out there but till it becomes the dominant browser it doesn't do us much good.. So I will just keep coding XHTML Transitional (most always) or Strict (when possible) till all the browsers ncatch up, something tell me I will be waiting awhile
CaIslander
From The Land Of SunShine, Surf & Code
WebXpertz Community Forums for Webmasters & Developers
jkd posted this at 00:45 — 18th August 2002.
They have: 21 posts
Joined: Oct 2000
XHTML 1.1
Internet Explorer doesn't really support it, but as long as I leave out the <?xml?> processing instruction, and serve is as text/html, it knows enough to go into CSS1Compat mode and render it like it would other XHTML.
If it was up to me though, everyone would use Mozilla and then I could properly serve XHTML as application/xhtml+xml complete with processing instructions...
Supermod @ CodingForums.com
disaster-master posted this at 07:45 — 16th August 2002.
She has: 2,154 posts
Joined: May 2001
I have successfully done two sites in XHTML Transitional and am working on a third now. Should have it finished by tomorrow complete with error free validation.
I love it when that happens(error free).
Haven't tackled the Strict version yet. Maybe next.
Jack Michaelson posted this at 07:23 — 15th August 2002.
He has: 1,733 posts
Joined: Dec 1999
Still using html 4.0 transitional, but currently making the move to xhtml.
Megan posted this at 20:03 — 14th August 2002.
She has: 11,421 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
I'm using xhtml 1.0 transitional almost exclusively right now, with a few minor exceptions for NS 4.x compatibility. Hopefully at some point I'll get some time to try strict on a personal site.
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
The Webmistress posted this at 07:05 — 14th August 2002.
She has: 5,586 posts
Joined: Feb 2001
Since I have started using Dreamweaver MX I have been using xhtml 1.0 transitional, so that's my last two sites.
Abhishek Reddy posted this at 05:53 — 14th August 2002.
He has: 3,348 posts
Joined: Jul 2001
I'm still using HTML 4.01 Transitional. Not yet made the move to XHTML... although, my next site will be.
Suzanne posted this at 21:49 — 13th August 2002.
She has: 5,507 posts
Joined: Feb 2000
Also, I coded a client site (not up yet, I'll link it when it is) to HTML 4.01 Transitional. Why? Her audience is primarily made up of, no kidding, N4.x users. *sigh*
Suzanne posted this at 21:48 — 13th August 2002.
She has: 5,507 posts
Joined: Feb 2000
My blog is XHTML 1.0 Strict -- synapticimpulse.com
My practice site is XHTML 1.0 Strict -- http://secrets.synapticimpulse.com
My business site, when it's done, will be XHTML 1.0 Strict with a table layout (the other two are CSS layouts).
The blog and the practice site have links for checking the validation.
kb posted this at 19:44 — 13th August 2002.
He has: 1,380 posts
Joined: Feb 2002
i havent started strict...i do some of the xhtml 1 transitional...i do it when i code now, but i am gonna have to go back and fix everything else....*sigh*
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.