Does anyone else NOT use partner pages?
It seems like everyone is using partner or link pages, which I think is just overall bad. I, on the other hand, choose valuable partners and place their link on my index page and all of my other pages by using a footer file.
Does anyone else do this? Anyone else trade links by other means then a partners page?
----------------------------------
Submit your site to my PR5 Directory!
Search Purple Web Directory
Megan posted this at 14:29 — 6th February 2006.
She has: 11,421 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
I think it's kind of rediculous really. They're just doing it for the PR, it's got nothing to do with the site or the users. It's not much different than when people put a bunch of keywords in small print at the bottom of the page. It's got nothing to do with humans, which I think is bad. And apparently Google has placed less importance on reciprocal links, so they need to be one-way to have any effect.
I'd like to do some really meaningful partnerships - real cross promotion (not some obscure link in the corner). I think partnerships should be much more than link exchanges - a partnership should be a realy meaningful relationship between the two sites. Supporting each other, actively referring visitors to each other, things like that. You could also do content exchanges if there's enough overlap on the topic. Stuff that's really mutually beneficial rather than just for PR.
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
Janet posted this at 06:26 — 19th February 2006.
She has: 133 posts
Joined: Jan 2006
I think a links page that contains links to other sites with similar content is a valuable tool for visitors and does help with the PR in the process. I personally can't stand sites that have general links and basically include anyone who wants to be included. That is not useful for site visitors. I don't think you can compare a quality directory with small keywords hidden on the bottom of a page. IMO. It is also good for new sites to get better rankings on msn and yahoo. I recently started a resources directory on my site, but am only including websites that have content similar to my business. Some are reciporcal links others are not. Here is an example of a valuable links directory. http://www.dcresource.com/links/ In my opinion this information is helpful to the site visitors. I also don't believe it has nothing to do with humans since I get many visitors a month being listed on this particular page and others I am listed on. "Humans" are clicking on my site.
Quality directories are good for site visitors, help with PR and also deliver traffic to the linked site.
Image Hosting | Everything Photography
Novelty Gifts
[url=http://www.squidoo.com/birthdaypartiesforkids/"]Theme Birthday Parties for Kids[/url]
dojo posted this at 19:22 — 18th February 2006.
She has: 87 posts
Joined: Dec 2004
I have links for the members that have provided unique articles. their links show throughout the site and the community. But putting links just for the sake of that PR seems a bit too much for me.
Busy posted this at 21:16 — 18th February 2006.
He has: 6,151 posts
Joined: May 2001
Most of my sites have related links but never any exchanged links
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.