Big business, bad website

JeevesBond's picture

He has: 3,956 posts

Joined: Jun 2002

I bank with Natwest who have always annoyed me by only supporting "IE and Firefox" for several years. The other day my house-mate, who also uses Opera, was on his banks online system and using it perfectly well... Finally some ammunition! So I found the "Minimum requirements" page, and e-mailed to them:

Me wrote:
Quoting from: https://www.nwolb.com/default.aspx?refererident=A7995032C8C9119DEF8BAEA608F6B4B90B7C336F&noscr=false&CookieCheck=1

"For technical reasons the service does not currently support the Opera browser. We are working with the publisher to address this."

I'd just like to point out that Barclays Banks website does work with the Opera browser. Perhaps, you should work on supporting standards instead of browsers?

The: "For technical reasons the service does not currently support the Opera browser. We are working with the publisher to address this." line is from their minimum requirements page. I also tried validating their site (http://www.natwest.com) and it failed with 18 errors.

Barclays are NatWest banks rivals, and I know it's petty. But they make enough profit to be developing web sites properly and overcoming so-callled "technical difficulties" in less time than the two years I've been waiting! Not only that, but these businesses should know how badly: "Your browser isn't supported", messages annoy their users. Damn, I'm considering taking my business to Barclays now!

Anyone else had problems with big business, bad website?

a Padded Cell our articles site!

DaveyBoy's picture

They have: 453 posts

Joined: Feb 2003

To be fair, i find it funny you care so much man. If the site didn't work for me on the browser i'm using i'd just use another browser for 2 mins to find out how in debt i am this week.

I know you have a point, but i don't really care lol

JeevesBond's picture

He has: 3,956 posts

Joined: Jun 2002

daveyboy wrote: I know you have a point, but i don't really care lol

LOL! I absolutely agree, but I've been swapping out to Firefox for about 2 years now, and it's worn me down. And it's not just this site, this is an example of many. What's even more annoying is how much better everything would be if these problems didn't exist! Sites designed with CSS simply look and feel better.

If every browser supported CSS perfectly we could be concentrating on getting SVG support right, or doing more stuff with XML and other collaborative technologies.

Anyway, it takes anal, annoying people, like myself, to get things done properly! Smiling

a Padded Cell our articles site!

Roo's picture

She has: 840 posts

Joined: Apr 1999

Quote: We are working with the publisher to address this.

What a line of BS! You're right, if they coded correctly to standards they wouldn't have an issue.

What does the code look like? Something out of an Office app?

Roo

Roo's picture

She has: 840 posts

Joined: Apr 1999

Oh BTW....try to use McAffe's site with Firefox or Opera......

teammatt3's picture

He has: 2,102 posts

Joined: Sep 2003

Quote: LOL! I absolutely agree, but I've been swapping out to Firefox for about 2 years now, and it's worn me down.

Good point. Let's all switch back to IE, then we won't notice any problems Wink

demonhale's picture

He has: 3,278 posts

Joined: May 2005

I dont care much about swapping browsers but on regular basis I look and use different browsers... And yes it really looks bad for a major company or corp to not understand that their actually different browsers... Thats why I do extensive cross-browser checks in hoping at least to have it viewed similar and backwards 90% of the time so youcan get meaningful explanations from a site... Explaininjg yourself wouldnt work much... Like "Best Viewed in IE" etc... is kindof lame... make it " be viewed " rather than choose one and code for it...

Busy's picture

He has: 6,151 posts

Joined: May 2001

My bank (ANZ) didn't support firefox, I phoned them up and asked whats up ... long story short they wee only worried about IE because it was the market leader, I tried to explain what a user agent switcher was but fell on deaf ears. I wrote (hand write) a nasty letter to bank manager asking for changes, i got similar reply from him so switched banks, now I can do internet banking (now I just need some money Laughing out loud )

Megan's picture

She has: 11,421 posts

Joined: Jun 1999

This is a bit of a different big company/bad website problem:

My cable company (http://www.rogers.com) has an online utility that lets you change what channels you are subscribed to. The first problem is that it's almost impossible to find it. The second problem is that after you go through the annoying process of picking which new channels you want (and figuring out how you're supposed to do that). You get a message along the lines of "Sorry, the system isn't working right now. Come back later." That's right -after 8 pages of annoying form selections, they tell you the system doesn't work!

Of all places, this also happened to me at Amazon the other day when I was attempting to post a book review. The "post review" link worked, I was able to write my review and even preview it. But when I went to save it? "Sorry, the review system is down right now."

Hello ?!?!?? Wouldn't it be nice to tell people this *before* they go through the work of filling out the forms??

Greg K's picture

He has: 2,145 posts

Joined: Nov 2003

Where I was working, we use Authorize.Net for crdit card processing. The revamped their "virtual terminal". Now it only works with IE. What is the big thing that doesn't work? Based on if you choose "Charge a card" or "Credit a card" it will display different input fields. The can't get it to work in firefox....

When I first contacted them becasue it was saying required inforation was supplied (becasue in firefox it didn't show the fields), they told me the problem was the browser, that something is BROKEN IN FIREFOX, so I will have to use IE!!!

Rediculous!

-Greg

Greg K's picture

He has: 2,145 posts

Joined: Nov 2003

Quote: Best Viewed in {browser}

--or--

Best Viewed at {dimensions}

These simply translate into "Hey we got our foot in the door, but we are too (pick one: dumb/ignorant/lazy/cheap) to completely come all the way."

Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.