It's a tie between the first and the third. Both are excellent. Maybe use the third one for the homepage because it's grand, majestic and sparkling and the first one can be for a links page or internal page because it's simple, elegant and captivating. But really, both are great. I don't like the second one at all, the two sides do not tie into each other, it's like two seperate pictures.
mikexx2020 posted this at 21:01 — 1st October 2006.
They don't really strike me as logos, more like headers. It looks like some regular text with a background image, I wouldn't consider that a logo. If I was forced to choose one, I would say the first one. It looks more sophisticated, more chess-like than the rest.
matt is right, these are not logos at all, Ill also say 1 for simplicity...
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.
webmasterD posted this at 20:55 — 1st October 2006.
They have: 4 posts
Joined: Sep 2006
It's a tie between the first and the third. Both are excellent. Maybe use the third one for the homepage because it's grand, majestic and sparkling and the first one can be for a links page or internal page because it's simple, elegant and captivating. But really, both are great. I don't like the second one at all, the two sides do not tie into each other, it's like two seperate pictures.
mikexx2020 posted this at 21:01 — 1st October 2006.
They have: 2 posts
Joined: Oct 2006
Cool thanks alot dude! Really helpful.
I didnt quite like the 2nd one either but thought about using it because it was the most colourful one. Ta!
teammatt3 posted this at 22:49 — 1st October 2006.
He has: 2,102 posts
Joined: Sep 2003
They don't really strike me as logos, more like headers. It looks like some regular text with a background image, I wouldn't consider that a logo. If I was forced to choose one, I would say the first one. It looks more sophisticated, more chess-like than the rest.
Check out logopond.com for some real logos.
demonhale posted this at 02:52 — 2nd October 2006.
He has: 3,278 posts
Joined: May 2005
matt is right, these are not logos at all, Ill also say 1 for simplicity...
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.