greetings. i realize the polls are closed, but i felt i would add my remarks. i don't read 101 in logo #1. it is a little too abstract for what point 101 does. you need a logo that will be read easily and will convey your message to the viewer. logo #2 is more interesting, but i don't think it matches your target audience. you might try a more illustrative, hand-drawn logo for your site. i really think you need to play up the fact that you sell contemporary art, photography etc.
JeevesBond posted this at 21:54 — 4th August 2005.
Initally - I didn't like either of them...my brain wanted to have a go at redesigning the logo itself.
The more I look at #2 the more I love it. It really works.
Saying that, I've just dropped it into Fireworks a deleted the blue areas and I feel that it looks better. I may be over stepping the mark here (sorry if I am - I'm not a designer or anything), but I think it looks more striking.
Talkfreelance posted this at 11:37 — 27th July 2005.
I know the poll is closed, but I thought you might still want an opinion.
I like the second one much more for the simple fact that most of your site is very square, and the logo is a little more circular. That's why I would choose that one.
Kurtis
Jack Michaelson posted this at 11:48 — 8th July 2005.
I am still undecided between the simple straight line logo, and this one. But I think, the example would be a little large. There is a fine line with a logo, between not enough and to much.
2nd one. much more interesting and the 0 in 101 actually works as a 0 rather than a square.
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.
r3a1 posted this at 15:23 — 9th August 2005.
He has: 28 posts
Joined: Aug 2005
greetings. i realize the polls are closed, but i felt i would add my remarks. i don't read 101 in logo #1. it is a little too abstract for what point 101 does. you need a logo that will be read easily and will convey your message to the viewer. logo #2 is more interesting, but i don't think it matches your target audience. you might try a more illustrative, hand-drawn logo for your site. i really think you need to play up the fact that you sell contemporary art, photography etc.
JeevesBond posted this at 21:54 — 4th August 2005.
He has: 3,956 posts
Joined: Jun 2002
Hmmm, it's sufficiently different from iomegas logo I think. The second one is by far the best.
Greg K posted this at 20:56 — 4th August 2005.
He has: 2,145 posts
Joined: Nov 2003
First impression on seeing the images, the left one reminded me of iomega's logo. (see http://www.dataclinic.co.uk/jaz-disk.jpg)
I take it you have changed the logos since your first posting, as I see no coloring in them, just black and grey.
If I had to choose between the two, i'd pick #2.
-Greg
locatepeople posted this at 20:10 — 4th August 2005.
He has: 377 posts
Joined: May 2005
2 for a website but I can see no.1 being the better if you were stamping it on crates.
wwwben posted this at 16:46 — 4th August 2005.
He has: 270 posts
Joined: Jan 2005
2
demonhale posted this at 05:27 — 4th August 2005.
He has: 3,278 posts
Joined: May 2005
any other options? 2nd one looks great but looks like IOI instead of 101
Renegade posted this at 02:17 — 4th August 2005.
He has: 3,022 posts
Joined: Oct 2002
Yip, second one for me as well
openhost.us posted this at 22:31 — 3rd August 2005.
They have: 2 posts
Joined: Aug 2005
I also like the 2nd logo, good luck
mattbutterworth posted this at 18:53 — 3rd August 2005.
They have: 9 posts
Joined: Aug 2005
Initally - I didn't like either of them...my brain wanted to have a go at redesigning the logo itself.
The more I look at #2 the more I love it. It really works.
Saying that, I've just dropped it into Fireworks a deleted the blue areas and I feel that it looks better. I may be over stepping the mark here (sorry if I am - I'm not a designer or anything), but I think it looks more striking.
Talkfreelance posted this at 11:37 — 27th July 2005.
They have: 15 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
I think the second one is better personally.
kazimmerman posted this at 22:52 — 25th July 2005.
He has: 698 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
I know the poll is closed, but I thought you might still want an opinion.
I like the second one much more for the simple fact that most of your site is very square, and the logo is a little more circular. That's why I would choose that one.
Kurtis
Jack Michaelson posted this at 11:48 — 8th July 2005.
He has: 1,733 posts
Joined: Dec 1999
The second one, because the '101' comes out more.
cyfocus posted this at 05:27 — 7th July 2005.
He has: 12 posts
Joined: Jul 2005
The second is good for a website but have your try that on black and white? what if you are going to put that on paper? does it look good?
steve40 posted this at 19:13 — 6th July 2005.
He has: 490 posts
Joined: May 2005
I am still undecided between the simple straight line logo, and this one. But I think, the example would be a little large. There is a fine line with a logo, between not enough and to much.
codfather posted this at 17:55 — 6th July 2005.
They have: 12 posts
Joined: Jun 2005
Thanks David - I've made another version of the second one which I think I prefer - what do you think?
http://www.point101.com/point101_new.gif
Thanks,
Kerry
davidjaymz posted this at 15:26 — 6th July 2005.
He has: 193 posts
Joined: Jul 2001
2nd one. much more interesting and the 0 in 101 actually works as a 0 rather than a square.
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.