Design Yeses and Noes

She has: 47 posts

Joined: Jul 2007

I just saw the thread railing against mirrored logos and went :eek: The last header I designed used not only a reflection but also bevelled corners and (oh, the shame! ) a drop shadow! So I plead, beg and beseech you all to give me a list of "bad" design elements and, if you can put your disgust into words, explain why they're bad.
It would also be very helpful if you could give examples of "good" design. It's important to know what I should be doing, too.

Megan's picture

She has: 11,421 posts

Joined: Jun 1999

I think the big danger is just having too many effects at once. Keep it simple and clean and use some restraint when it comes to any special effect (gradients, reflections, shadows, bevels, or anthing that requires a filter).

Roo's picture

She has: 840 posts

Joined: Apr 1999

'Flat' designs, that is ones with no strokes, drop shadows, bevels, mirrors etc, really are just so much more clean and professional looking than ones that have all of those effects.

Compare some well known logos to ones that have effects applied to them and see the difference.

That is not to say that effects can't be used...sometimes they can work well...it depends on what the brand is and who it's target group is.

That said...effects should be used sparingly and lighting even when they are called for.

Roo

JeevesBond's picture

He has: 3,956 posts

Joined: Jun 2002

No element in design is bad (mmm-kay) per se, but there are lots of effects that have been overdone on the net. We aren't railing against reflections by themselves: we're railing against all the Web 2.0 fans badly overdoing reflections on everything! Particularly where they're not very appropriate.

It's all about using the right design to solve the right need. If you get a chance, pick up a copy of Elements of Graphic Design. Am reading it at the moment and it's well worth getting. Smiling

a Padded Cell our articles site!

She has: 47 posts

Joined: Jul 2007

Thanks so much! I've been looking at lots of different sites while keeping in mind what you've said, and I think I'm slowly learning what looks professional and what to avoid.
Roo, I checked out the logos of several big, famous companies and you're right!

So clean, simple and just 'cause Photoshop can do it doesn't mean it has to be done.

Oh, and thanks for the link, JeevesBond. I googled the author and have found some incredibly useful articles.

Megan's picture

She has: 11,421 posts

Joined: Jun 1999

And, really, you should be creating logos in a vector drawing program so that they can be easily scaled for different media. And they should work in black and white or 2-color printing etc.

She has: 47 posts

Joined: Jul 2007

Megan;222203 wrote: And, really, you should be creating logos in a vector drawing program so that they can be easily scaled for different media. And they should work in black and white or 2-color printing etc.

OMG thank you for this advice!!!!! I know I seem a bit over-excited but I think it's solved a problem that's had me tearing my hair out!!!! I resized the text from a scanned business card as part of a header for a site but it ended up blurry and no matter what I fiddled with, it was never quite right. I'm going to give myself a crash course in vector graphics and have another go!

( ...and, no, I'm not charging for my inept webdesign services. A small local business is getting a website at cost in exchange for allowing me to develop my ,err, skills. :blush: )

Megan's picture

She has: 11,421 posts

Joined: Jun 1999

Inkscape isn't in the league of Adobe Illustrator by any means but it should work just fine for you right now. It works fine for me right now actually!

Magenta;222256 wrote: OMG thank you for this advice!!!!! I know I seem a bit over-excited but I think it's solved a problem that's had me tearing my hair out!!!! I resized the text from a scanned business card as part of a header for a site but it ended up blurry and no matter what I fiddled with, it was never quite right. I'm going to give myself a crash course in vector graphics and have another go!

This is a really common problem in web design! You ask the client for their logo and they either don't have it at all or don't remember where it is or only have it as a small .gif. You ask who created it and they've lost track of the designer, or it was their wife with a bad photo editing program or something like that. What a pain!

She has: 47 posts

Joined: Jul 2007

LOL. Perhaps in cases like that you should just create a new logo for them. Something simple, like golden arches or a swoosh.Sticking out tongue

JeevesBond's picture

He has: 3,956 posts

Joined: Jun 2002

Megan wrote: And, really, you should be creating logos in a vector drawing program

Good point! Give Inkscape a try, it's Free software and won't cost you a penny either!

a Padded Cell our articles site!

She has: 47 posts

Joined: Jul 2007

JeevesBond;222233 wrote: Good point! Give Inkscape a try, it's Free software and won't cost you a penny either!

Oooo, free stuff! I have Photoshop CS2 ( don't tell Demonhale Sad ) but I think it would be worthwhile having a specialised vector graphics editor for making more professional designs ( and to play with! Laughing out loud ) Thanks for the link.

He has: 629 posts

Joined: May 2007

You may be interested in reading Web Pages That Suck -- "Biggest Mistakes in Web Design 1995-2015"

Warning - the page takes four minutes to load on dial-up! Sad

Cordially, David
--
delete from internet where user_agent="MSIE" and version < 8;

She has: 47 posts

Joined: Jul 2007

webwiz;222245 wrote: You may be interested in reading Web Pages That Suck -- "Biggest Mistakes in Web Design 1995-2015"

Warning - the page takes four minutes to load on dial-up! Sad

I came across that site a while ago and it's great, isn't it?! One of the sites linked to as a "bad" site has a statcounter that shows far more visitors than would be expected for the small site it is. I wonder if they check out where their visitors came from or whether they just think they have a particularly attractive site.Sad

demonhale's picture

He has: 3,278 posts

Joined: May 2005

One thought, the current standards in software for logos ie Adobe Illustrator, and most Graphic Companies want you to have Photoshop, I feel quite monopolized by adobe that I seldom use their products anymore to show I can still make great designs with any other graphic software and vector tools...

demonhale's picture

He has: 3,278 posts

Joined: May 2005

or have them recreated by professionals like me...Wink Sticking out tongue

She has: 47 posts

Joined: Jul 2007

demonhale;222308 wrote: or have them recreated by professionals like me...Wink Sticking out tongue

Why pay someone for a logo when there are already so many good ones out there? I have a gallery of swooshes in 256 websafe colours, ready for future clients to add to their page. Put a dropshadow on it and Nike will never guess. ( Anyway, my job is to make websites, not solve client's legal problems. ) Laughing out loud

Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.