1024x768 fixed
That's the current site spec for the page I'm working on, and it has been that way since December of 2003. Now I'm staring at two weeks of recent log results, looking like a solid 10% of folks are still using the site with Netscape 4.x editions:
1 Internet Explorer 6.x 766,357 47,124 60.85%
2 Netscape 4.x 41,506 7,758 10.02%
3 Internet Explorer 5.x 71,164 6,698 8.65%
4 Netscape 6.x 105,907 5,168 6.67%
5 Netscape 7.x 79,876 2,714 3.50%
Will be getting screen resolution information logged, but with 10% of folks using Netscape 4.x, I'm figuring on a large percentage of 800x600 users.
Tempted to stay with the 1024x768 fixed width, and vastly improve screen real estate quality, so even 800x600 folks get full navigation and see a bit of what they are missing. Right now, they don't get full navigation and miss a complete column of content. It will be an improvement for them, since they are getting screwed over at the moment, and the extra real estate will come in handy.
Also, the design will have to work well in Netscape 4.x, no questions.
What do you folks think?
-B
Timewell posted this at 17:39 — 16th September 2004.
They have: 344 posts
Joined: Jun 2002
Could we have a link so it could be "tried out"? If you're looking to get the same design in all resolutions then liquid CSS or tables could be your answer...but to do this you may have to sacrifice some of your design...if you make your site for 800x600 then it should be ok in the higher resolutions - albeit a lot smaller!
Do what you think is best, if you've been getting no moans about the site in 800x600 yet still get plenty of visitors - you must be doing ok.
no1golfpro.co.uk - High quality golf equipment at competitive prices.
Busy posted this at 22:38 — 16th September 2004.
He has: 6,151 posts
Joined: May 2001
IMO since your going for NS4.* you'll be doing without the bells and whistles so would probably be better with a fixed 800x600 if you were to go fixed. Liquid would be better if your layout could handle it, this way you wont have to upgrade your layout once the stats change.
Megan posted this at 14:22 — 17th September 2004.
She has: 11,421 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
You could also serve a different stylesheet to Netscape users so they get a basic design and put in the bells and whistles for the other browsers that support them.
Regarding your three column layout, you could use the right column for unnecessary but nice to see types of content like advertising, related links, that sort of things. So those users aren't really missing out on anything important, but users of higher resolutions have some extra features to work with.
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.