New Design
When did that get there....
I love the new design! (I can even tell you what the logo is.... lol)
One tid bit, though: Can I have my newest threads link?
Great work!
Mark Hensler
If there is no answer on Google, then there is no question.
NSS posted this at 09:11 — 17th January 2001.
They have: 488 posts
Joined: Feb 2000
Wow! It's a very nice design work and color. I login as usual and I thought I must have click on a different website for a moment as I normally use my favorites link and expected to see the fuzzy image and blue scanning lines.
Yes, excellent work by Megan.
Regards.
NSS
[Edited by NSS on Jan. 17, 2001 at 04:23 AM]
Justin S posted this at 13:36 — 17th January 2001.
They have: 2,076 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
Yes, pretty nice! I'm assuming a banner will be going to the right of the logo, correct? Anyway, I'm moving this to the Forum Specific Comments...
Megan posted this at 14:41 — 17th January 2001.
She has: 11,421 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
Yay! It's so cool to see it up there !!!! I'm so excited!! And thanks to everyone for complementing on it!!!
(and yes, the grey space is for a banner ad. I always think that banner ads look better if they're designed into the page)
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
Jaiem posted this at 14:48 — 17th January 2001.
They have: 1,191 posts
Joined: Apr 1999
Not too shabby!
Justin S posted this at 15:10 — 17th January 2001.
They have: 2,076 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
Yep, I agree 100%.
Justin Stayton - [email] [icq]
Chad Simper posted this at 17:17 — 17th January 2001.
He has: 424 posts
Joined: Mar 1999
Glad everyone likes it... The kudos of course go to Megan for the great design as you have already done.
I am really impressed too. I like the red because it brightens things up.
I was up til 3:00 AM this morning working on it and I got all the main pages updated. I will be spending the day today working on putting the polling system online, getting every single page updated with the new design, putting Max's 'newest threads' link and a number of other links back, and taking care of some administrative things.
Within the next couple of weeks, I will be putting a member banner system together. The moderators have already discussed this and they all think it is a great idea, as do I. And yes, that is what the dead gray space is for. I will let everyone know what the requirements are for your banner rotation when I get closer to being able to set that up.
Stay tuned... I know a lot of you have been worried that TWF is going downhill... It has been, but once I have the new design, I will be working on building the traffic up again and I hope that all of you that have continued to support TWF through this slow time will be here to help out.
P.S. We have a really cool idea brewing in the moderator forum for picking up traffic that I hope we can get going soon too!
anat posted this at 18:09 — 17th January 2001.
They have: 304 posts
Joined: Dec 1999
Well, as it happens, I'm working from another computer at the moment. Didn't have the bookmark, so I had to looks through all the variations of the domain names (there are also webmasterforums.com webmastersforum.com amd webmasterforum.com - took me a while to think about the hyphen )
So, my first reaction was - oops, wrong again. Yet something about the forums names was too familiar...
Great design Megan! Much more lively! Too much blues around web sites as it is. This will be much more memorable.
Denmark 3 posted this at 23:31 — 17th January 2001.
They have: 881 posts
Joined: Feb 2000
Looks great. I thought I came to a different site for a second.
KeithMcL posted this at 14:59 — 18th January 2001.
He has: 176 posts
Joined: Oct 1999
Yes, great design Megan
Peter J. Boettcher posted this at 17:38 — 18th January 2001.
They have: 812 posts
Joined: Feb 2000
Looks great!
Maybe the links along the upper right (forums,profile, etc) could be images just to jazz it up a bit?
Very uniform throughout, great job.
PJ | Are we there yet?
pjboettcher.com
Chad Simper posted this at 18:00 — 18th January 2001.
He has: 424 posts
Joined: Mar 1999
Peter,
I thought about graphics up top for the links, but I really want to keep the load down as much as possible. I don't notice a graphics intensive site because of my DSL connection, but we have an extremely large portion of visitors that are on 56k or lower and loading 5 additional graphics that aren't needed really doesn't make sense.
I may do it anyway though ... Have to see what type of mood I am in tonight when I do a little more work.
Anyone really think it would matter to put the top five links into graphics?
Peter J. Boettcher posted this at 18:08 — 18th January 2001.
They have: 812 posts
Joined: Feb 2000
Chad,
Optimized images of that size would be very small (file size) even for dial-up users. It looks great the way it is, I just thought that maybe by using a graphic you could break out of the horizontal bar, just to add a little more flair.
PJ | Are we there yet?
pjboettcher.com
NSS posted this at 01:16 — 19th January 2001.
They have: 488 posts
Joined: Feb 2000
Hi Chad,
In my opinion, it's just fine using text links and if converted to image links it will only clutter it with too many images when you have the banner later on in the grey area on top of the text links.
Regards,
NSS
Brian Farkas posted this at 02:31 — 19th January 2001.
They have: 1,015 posts
Joined: Apr 1999
I like the new design also-
I would like the new posts link too, though.. I know you have a link on the main page, but I'm talking about the link that you can click on that would bring you to the new posts in a thread.
If you could add that, it would be perfect.
Brian
mjames posted this at 03:21 — 19th January 2001.
They have: 2,064 posts
Joined: Dec 1999
*applause*
Nice job! It was a much-needed change for the better. It's still not perfect, I'll be posting a new thread in a second with my suggested improvements.
Chad Simper posted this at 17:00 — 19th January 2001.
He has: 424 posts
Joined: Mar 1999
Brian,
There is a "Last Post" link on the main page for each forum that takes you to the latest post in that forum... Is that the link you are looking for? If not, would you point out another forum that has the link you are looking for because I am lost..
Chad Simper posted this at 17:07 — 19th January 2001.
He has: 424 posts
Joined: Mar 1999
OK, I think I found the link you were referring to ... is that the one that appears at the top of the forumdisplay.php page now Brian?
Mark Hensler posted this at 17:57 — 19th January 2001.
He has: 4,048 posts
Joined: Aug 2000
I think he's talking about the "first unread post" link here:
http://www.vbulletin.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=4193
Gliebster posted this at 08:35 — 22nd January 2001.
They have: 21 posts
Joined: Sep 2000
I like the new look too. Red is a nice change.
Denmark 3 posted this at 17:03 — 22nd January 2001.
They have: 881 posts
Joined: Feb 2000
Red is better than blue. To many web sites use Blue.
JP Stones posted this at 19:55 — 22nd January 2001.
They have: 2,390 posts
Joined: Nov 1998
Hi all! I hope everyone is well!
I certainly like the new design.
A few pointers for Mega/Chad:
- The font is wrong for the design. CLose but not quite right, I would highly recommend playibng with new fonts and caps combinations to get the fell/weright of the log perfect.
- though slick I think is it a bit flat. Have you tried applying some filters? Megabn if you send me thePhotoshop file I can work on it over the weekend for an hour and see what I come up with...
When you get to posts the red disapears, any chance of looking itno this as it makes it a bit boring.
Still exploring the rest, good to see a change on the site.
JP
JP Stones posted this at 20:01 — 22nd January 2001.
They have: 2,390 posts
Joined: Nov 1998
yep, congrats guys, it is very neat I like it more and more.
any chance of getting member totals added to the front page. I always thought it impressed new visitors and showed people this was not one of those dead forums.
thoughts?
Chad Simper posted this at 20:13 — 22nd January 2001.
He has: 424 posts
Joined: Mar 1999
Good to see you're still around JP!
I think the font is actually good for the design. I really like verdana because it is a smooth flowing font. Plus, with the "round" font used in the logo, it works well.
Since the site is more for information sharing and less of a graphics display, I don't really think it needs to have millions of graphics. For this site, I think "form and function" outweigh design. I like the clean, simple design and don't really think cluttering it with more intense graphics is going to accomplish anything more.
Agreed. I will be making the gray buttons that appear with each post red so that it takes care of this suggestion.
After I do some spring cleaning of the member database, I will be posting stats (total members, total posts, etc.) on the main page. This will happen after I have the banner system up and running.
Thanks for the suggestions JP, and everyone else!
Denmark 3 posted this at 23:47 — 22nd January 2001.
They have: 881 posts
Joined: Feb 2000
Chad,
Problem that probably should be fixed ASAP. The banner is above the logo part. It is supposed to be in the gray section. Correct? The banner shows up on every page too. The redirect pages etc.
Chad Simper posted this at 00:02 — 23rd January 2001.
He has: 424 posts
Joined: Mar 1999
Yes, that's probably because I'm working on it.
Denmark 3 posted this at 00:05 — 23rd January 2001.
They have: 881 posts
Joined: Feb 2000
Oh sorry. When I posted that you weren't logged in or on ICQ so I just wanted to let you know.
JP Stones posted this at 12:41 — 23rd January 2001.
They have: 2,390 posts
Joined: Nov 1998
good to be back mate!
well working in this field I must stand by my comment, though it looks far from bad, it could be improved - just needs fiddling. Megan, what do you say?
oh for sure, but I'm asking for more depth to be put into the header - not for more clutter far from it.
what exactly will the spring cleaning conist of?
can you briefly explain the banner system (standard exchange?) as I missed those conversations.
JP
Denmark 3 posted this at 15:55 — 23rd January 2001.
They have: 881 posts
Joined: Feb 2000
Try to make the header more 3Dish. Maybe some sort of drop shadow to the text or something.
Ravi Pachai posted this at 01:51 — 24th January 2001.
They have: 433 posts
Joined: Apr 2000
I agree with JP.
Ravi
Chad Simper posted this at 02:19 — 24th January 2001.
He has: 424 posts
Joined: Mar 1999
And working in the field as well, I have to stand by my comment ... I'm not usually a really stubborn person but on this one, I am sticking by my choice. Verdana is going to remain the font.
I'm not against changing it... I think it looks good as is but if you or anyone else want to take a stab at improving it, feel free to do so. If it is an imrpovement, we'll defintily change it.
I am going to run a maintenance script that will delete all inactive members (never made a post and older than a few months).
The banner system is currently in the testing phase. It has currently been discussed by the moderators only. More information will be posted for all to participate on February 1.
P.S. Check your e-mail JP. I have sent you a matter that needs to be dealt with immediately several times now with no response.
mjames posted this at 00:57 — 25th January 2001.
They have: 2,064 posts
Joined: Dec 1999
Verdana, the current font, certaintly isn't bad, but I think we should try using Arial. It would freshen things up and is just as good, or better.
Denmark 3 posted this at 02:14 — 25th January 2001.
They have: 881 posts
Joined: Feb 2000
I don't mind either way. Although I prefer Verdena I would like to see what Arial looks like here too.
Megan posted this at 02:43 — 25th January 2001.
She has: 11,421 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
I thought that JP was talking about the font I used in the logo. I could see how he thinks it's a little off. I'll try some other options and see what happens. I like the idea of using a more casual, rounded font though, to symbolize the human element of the forums.
As for adding more depth to the logo, I'm not sure how I would do that. I guess I could try some things and see what happens. I made the logo in Fireworks which I'm not too familiar with.
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.