HTML wrong? - Sound works in IE not in NS

They have: 3 posts

Joined: Sep 1999

I'm very new at this...would someone please help! I am having a problem getting all my page stuff to work in NS. Everything works fine in IE, but my sound and hover won't work in NS. At least I think it's hover,when the color of the link changes as the mouse passes over it?
The address: www.apci.net/~tjdubree
The code:

<HTML>

<BODY background="blackpaper.jpg">
</BODY>

<STYLE type="text/css">
a:link { color: silver; text-decoration: none }
a:hover { color: orange; text-decoration: none }
a:visited { color: yellow; text-decoration: none }
</STYLE></A></A></A>

<CENTER><U><FONT COLOR="yellow"><FONT SIZE="+2">
Links
</CENTER></U></FONT></FONT>

<BR>

<CENTER><U><FONT COLOR="yellow">
Motorcycles
</CENTER></U></FONT>
<CENTER>
<A HREF="http://www.jackssalvage.com" target="_top">
Rebel Accessories
</CENTER></A>

<BR>

<CENTER><U><FONT COLOR="yellow">
Melissa Etheridge
</CENTER></U></FONT>
<CENTER>
<A HREF="http://www.melissaetheridge.com" target="_top">
Melissa Etheridge
</CENTER></A>

<BR>

<CENTER><U><FONT COLOR="yellow">
E-Cards & Flowers
</CENTER></U></FONT>
<CENTER>
<A HREF="http://www.3dgreetings.com" target="_top">
3D Greetings
</CENTER></A>
<CENTER>
<A HREF="http://www.egreetings.com" target="_top">
E Greetings
</CENTER></A>

<BR>

<CENTER><U><FONT COLOR="yellow">
Download Sounds
</CENTER></U></FONT>
<CENTER>
<A HREF="http://www.soundamerica.com" target="_top">
Sound America
</CENTER></A>
<CENTER>
<A HREF="http://www.dragonden.simplenet.com/pinkfloyd.htm" target="_top">
Pink Floyd
</CENTER></A>
<CENTER>
<A HREF="http://www.knightvision.com/midis" target="_top">
Knight Vision
</CENTER></A>

<BR>

<CENTER><U><FONT COLOR="yellow">
3D Wallpaper
</CENTER></U></FONT>
<CENTER>
<A HREF="http://www.digitalblasphemy.com" target="_top">
Digital Blasphemy
</CENTER></A>

<BGSOUND SRC="Harley.wav" LOOP="false">
</BGSOUND>

<BGSOUND SRC="Low Rider.mid" LOOP=true">
</BGSOUND>

</HTML>

They have: 36 posts

Joined: Jul 1999

for all it's worth... netscape doesn't understand hover... it's not a very smart browser. You can write a little javascript to do the same thing, but that's too much for just a link hover effect. This is why most webdesigners don't like netscape... why doesn't it just go away? sheesh. well, just work around it. Most of your viewers will use IE or AOL and it will look cool, but without link hover effects it'll look just fine.

----------
Dan Tucker
http://ctpball.paintballresource.com

They have: 67 posts

Joined: Aug 1999

Hi tj,
As shorty said, Netscpae does not support the hover , it also does not recognize <bgsound...> either, you might like to change that to <embed...> as modern versions of IE and NS support it.

As for the rest of shorty's comments, I have never read such a load of generalized crap in my life, most of your visitors will be IE users and NS users, AOL is down the list and is a very poor browser in most peoples books, so it is hit and miss as far as sound goes there.
good luck

Webmaster A1 JavaScripts
A1 JavaScripts
Web Development - Big Resources Inc
BIG Resources.com

They have: 3 posts

Joined: Sep 1999

I tried EMBED... but all I got was a sound bar on my screen and I had to push the play button to hear anything.

John Pollock's picture

He has: 628 posts

Joined: Mar 1999

On the EMBED tag, you can hide it using hidden="true" and start it automatically using autostart="true". Example:

<EMBED SRC="url" hidden="true" autostart="true">

They have: 67 posts

Joined: Aug 1999

Sorry tj,
Yes, John is quite right, I forgot about that part, sorry.
good luck.
Ian

They have: 297 posts

Joined: Apr 1999

Shorty, you got trapped in Microsoft's marketing strategy. Its their policy to integrate technology into their browsers which is not supported by Netscape in order to make Netscape look bad. Its that simple.

And by the way: Since Netscape merged with AOL in the long run AOL will probably use Netscape's browser.

All we can hope is that at some point in time both browsers will have such a high copatibility to w3 standards that everything will look the same in both browsers. CSS is a good step forward, but since its not completely supported by neither browser it doesnt always help a lot. A good application for css is to fix the font size on a web page, and not make it subject to the preferences of the user. That works in all 4.x browsers to my knowledge.

Shorty, if you want a good browser download Netscape's 5 beta @ http://www.mozilla.org and be reminded that if there wouldnt have been Netscape you would not be using the internet today, but probably sneak through some text based microsoft online service with 3 bytes per second which is about the average connection rate to microsoft.com.

Later,

Malte

----------
Malte Ubl - [red]Germany[/red] - http://goKewl.com/
[red]The beats of 1000 hearts inside...[/red] the merciless pulsation... [red]and all I know is I'll be back...[/red] back to trance nation!

They have: 141 posts

Joined: Aug 1999

IE may be a ripoff of Netscape, but it is a much better Ripoff. Everyone claims Netscape Loads Faster, nonsence, it takes twice as long to render on my machine. Netscape was better when Netscape 3 was out. I would not use Netscape all together if I didn't use Linux. Microsoft is developing for their own O/S, so it is a given that their browser is going to function better on it.

As far as support for Stylesheets go, Netscape is much poorer in that regard. You can't do half of whan you can do with IE, and background images look especially bad. I just hope Netscape 5 is better, it is bad enough now that I have to download their whole communicator just to get a browser.

----------
The dLo Network
http://dlo.net

They have: 2,390 posts

Joined: Nov 1998

I will have to throw myself on the fire here and say that I prefer IE because it is more coderfriendly than Netscape...however I do think it is a shame that Netscape will eventually bite the dust.
JP

----------
[red]The Next Step in Website Development [/red] - http://www.what-next.com
The Webmaster Promotion and Resource Center

They have: 5,633 posts

Joined: Jan 1970

I don't think it will be a shame when Netscape disappears - it will be a step forward in the future of web design. The shame is that Netscape has been around for so long and has failed to make a better product.

They have: 297 posts

Joined: Apr 1999

Actually, Microsoft has concrete plans to use Mozilla's layout engine in their next major release of IE. So, an end to Netscape is not in sight at all, however, we get what we all want, two browsers which render one document the same way.

Later,

Malte

----------
Malte Ubl - [red]Germany[/red] - http://goKewl.com/
[red]The beats of 1000 hearts inside...[/red] the merciless pulsation... [red]and all I know is I'll be back...[/red] back to trance nation!

They have: 2,390 posts

Joined: Nov 1998

Really, where did you get this info?
JP

----------
[red]The Next Step in Website Development [/red] - http://www.what-next.com
The Webmaster Promotion and Resource Center

Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.