Cache questions
My entire site is uniform, that's why I use SSI (Server side includes). So, every webpages of mine is like this:
<#..include page1..>
<#..include page2..>
The page's text here....
<..include page3..>
I was wondering If I could cache all the INCLUDED pages in order to increase the speed. My problem is though that The browser takes all the included pages as one. So, is there any case of caching ONLY the included pages?
Thanx a lot.
Coddy
John Pollock posted this at 22:25 — 26th January 2000.
He has: 628 posts
Joined: Mar 1999
>"The browser takes all the included pages as one"
I'm not sure what you mean here..? I thought the browser cached the included files and thus pages load faster automatically. It could depend on your cache settings though..
[This message has been edited by John Pollock (edited 26 January 2000).]
Java Script: A Beginner's Guide
Page Resource
Coddy posted this at 16:04 — 27th January 2000.
They have: 31 posts
Joined: Dec 1999
Really?
I didn't know that!!! So, in general, all the included files are cached, right?
That's so cool!!!
Thanx a lot!!!
Coddy
AndyB posted this at 05:53 — 30th January 2000.
They have: 344 posts
Joined: Aug 1999
This isn't an answer, it's two questions
If the fixed portions of each page were handled with external js scripts then the server include would not be needed (which may, by convention, require inclusion with the download whether or not the load exists in a user cache).
And if fully qualified URLs are used either for includes or scripts (or other webpage bits), do some server O/S insist of loading that from its server source regardless of whether the object exists in a local cache or not?
If anyone knows -- please send e-mail to [email protected]
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.