Linux Not Ready for Home Use
The big news in Linux for the past two years has been its increasing use by huge organizations, from IBM to the Chinese government. They are spending their considerable resources building servers and routers with Linux OSes, as opposed to Microsoft's.
Some of the industry blogs (including wireless "always-on" advocates) are predicting a huge increase in home use as well. In fact, HP and WalMart are already packaging Linux with their electronic hardware products.
I don't see Linux taking off that quickly, however. On the single-user level, Linux is still for people like me, who like to tinker with new technology. It's not for home users who purchase PCs like many people would purchase a car or refrigerator; i.e, for style and convenience.
As an example...
For the past few weeks, I've been setting up a dual-boot system on my home PC. Why dual-boot? Because I don't feel like purchasing a new PC at the moment, just so I can have one that runs Linux and one that runs Windows.
I chose to use Red Hat Fedora 2, because I was already familliar with the Red Hat distro. I went to RH's site to see if I could download it, partly because it's free that way. But no dice - I didn't have the disk space.
So, the next step was to purchase a new hard drive. I went to the Newegg.com site, which had some excellent bargains. I purchased a 40GB Western Digital, and waited a few days for it to be delivered.
I then happily installed the drive and booted up the PC, only to discover that the motherboard (ASUS P3B-F) wasn't recognizing it. Went to the ASUS site and downloaded the latest BIOS config, flashed it onto the motherboard, and then re-booted. The BIOS still didn't recognize the drive.
Eventually, I contacted Newegg, who said they would replace the drive with a new one. To make the long story short, I received the replacement drive a week later.
I installed the drive, and success! The motherboard saw it!
The next step was to install the Fedora OS. I decided against downloading it from Red Hat, because if the new hard drive blew out, then I would have lost the download, so I purchased the Red Hat Fedora Bible, which contained four CDs of the Fedora 2 distro.
I disconnected the drive with Windows on it, and then installed Fedora on the new hard drive.
Worked like a charm!
OK, now the next step was to reconnect the Windows drive, and configure Fedora so it would boot up giving me the option of choosing either Windows or Fedora. To do this, I had to add some lines to Fedora's grub.conf file (Grub being the Linux boot file).
I rebooted the PC, and there were now two boot options, Fedora or Windows XP. But when I choose XP, the screen went blank!
Two hours later, after some serious reconfiguring and rebooting, I concluded that Fedora had blown away the Windows boot sector!
Okay....The point of the narrative is this: No way is Joe Consumer going to go through all these gyrations simply to say he has Linux on his PC.
The saga continues...
I don't mean to make the Linux install sound like an ordeal, because if you like tinkering with PCs, you will learn a lot. On the other hand, I don't think the average home user is ready for this.
OK, I temporarily gave up on dual-booting and am now working on Linux exclusively. That's OK, because it'll force me to learn more about Linux. (On the other hand, there are no drivers available for my sound card or scanner.) The good news is that surfing the net is "smooth" with the Mozilla browser that comes with Fedora. In fact, all the apps so far that come with Fedora have been very quick. The only one I'm disappointed with is the graphics package, GIMP. You can't print images with GIMP, you can only post Web images. If you do try to print, the image comes out with a lot of funny dots on it. According to the docs, the app has no CMYK capability.
I checked the Windows hard drive yesterday, and determined the data is still there. Unfortunately, the OS doesn't work any more, after Fedora wiped out the boot sector. My next step is to wipe the drive and install Windows again. This time, however, I'm going to partition the drive with a product called Acronis Disk Director. When I purchased it, I ordered the CD version but it won't be delivered for another four weeks, maybe. I found this out after about ten emails. Even then, they didn't give me a shipping number. Sloppy service, but I've read reviews about Acronis and their products rank highly.
Abhishek Reddy posted this at 04:03 — 4th February 2005.
He has: 3,348 posts
Joined: Jul 2001
Each distro is unique not only because they have their own package management, installer, logo and web space. One of the critical factors is the development style. Fedora Core is still somewhat experimental (RH to Fedora is quite a switch). On top of that, Fedora's release cycle is ~6 months -- it's a distro best kept updated. Given this, I think a review of Fedora Core 2 as a basis for generalising about GNU/Linux isn't fair.
You're better off trying FC3 or waiting for FC4 if you must use it. Or else try Xandros, SuSE, or Linspire for easy point-and-click distros. If you're feeling adventurous, give Debian, Slackware, or Gentoo a go. They're far more mature than Fedora. Arguably better installation and package management too.
I've experienced the opposite with regards to boot sector collateral. Windows twice overwrote the MBR making it difficult to boot into Linux. This is unusual, though, as it's only twice out of many dual-boot installs that went perfectly. You could try to repair your boot sector using a LiveCD. It's a good idea to make floppy boot disks too, for just such situations.
I don't see the relevance of your hardware issues to the central point of this article. All that can and does happen in many other circumstances. Bad luck that you ran into it while trying to install Linux.
The GIMP is not a good print design tool. A great deal of free/open software was designed with networking in mind (hence *BSD, tight network security, etc). The GIMP reflects that as it's made primarily for web graphics. Lately, it's been improved to handle digital photography better. I can't see any great leaps in print functionality in the near future.
Zeus posted this at 11:00 — 4th February 2005.
He has: 16 posts
Joined: Feb 2005
Dunno... my 50 years old mother has no problems using Linux... Why not ready for home use?
And your Johnny might just as well want to just want to surf internet and read his emails with his computer he bought from IBM. No problems with that, IMO. Why would Johnny bother with dual boot (which he has never heard of probably).
Actually Linux would be even better for him. He buys computer, sets it up by using manual, boots it up and he has everything there. And it will not disappear and he doesn't have need to format his drive every year to not lose performance. He gets rock solid system and he stays with it.
(That's the best case of course there might happen loads of bad things).
rtroxel posted this at 01:56 — 5th February 2005.
He has: 286 posts
Joined: Mar 2003
Thanks for the feedback.
I still like Linux and will continue to experiment with it. Fedora apparently wiped out the boot sector on the Windows drive. I tried some software called GAG (available at gag.sourceforge.net) but the app reported that there was NO boot sector, so I'm going to be repartitioning the drive, etc..
teammatt3 posted this at 17:21 — 5th February 2005.
He has: 2,102 posts
Joined: Sep 2003
I have SuSE on my hard drive, I have a dual boot though. I think the reason why you had to buy a new hard drive for Linux was because you didn't defrag your hard drive before you loaded up Linux?
Last week, I tried to remove Linux, because it would not read my modem. I deleted the partition it was on, and it prevented me from booting up windows. I had to reinstall Linux again to boot up windows. The worst part was, it messed up all my drivers so I was forced to reinstall all my hardware.
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.